Albanian
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Belarusian
Bengali
Bosnian
Catalan
Czech
Danish
Deutsch
Dutch
English
Estonian
Finnish
Français
Greek
Haitian Creole
Hebrew
Hindi
Hungarian
Icelandic
Indonesian
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Latvian
Lithuanian
Macedonian
Mongolian
Norwegian
Persian
Polish
Portuguese
Romanian
Russian
Serbian
Slovak
Slovenian
Spanish
Swahili
Swedish
Turkish
Ukrainian
Vietnamese
Български
中文(简体)
中文(繁體)
Critical Reviews in Toxicology 2019-Feb

Hexavalent chromium and stomach cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Samo registrirani korisnici mogu prevoditi članke
Prijava Registriraj se
Veza se sprema u međuspremnik
Mina Suh
Daniele Wikoff
Loren Lipworth
Michael Goodman
Seneca Fitch
Liz Mittal
Caroline Ring
Deborah Proctor

Ključne riječi

Sažetak

Hexavalent chromium [Cr(VI)] is known to cause lung cancer in workers of certain industries, but an association with stomach cancer is uncertain and widely debated. Systematic review and meta-analyses were conducted to assess the risk of stomach cancer mortality/morbidity in humans and experimental animals exposed to Cr(VI). In accordance with the protocol (PROSPERO #CRD4201605162), searches in PubMed and Embase®, and reviews of secondary literature bibliographies, were used to identify eligible studies. Critical appraisal of internal validity and qualitative integration were carried out using the National Toxicology Program's Office of Health Assessment and Translation (OHAT) approach; meta-analyses were conducted based on the occupational data (the only data suitable for quantitative assessment). Forty-seven publications (3 animal, 44 occupational, 0 non-occupational) met the eligibility criteria. Stomach cancer was only observed in one high risk of bias animal study, and in the low risk of bias studies no stomach cancer was observed. Thus, confidence in this evidence base is high. Environmental epidemiology studies did not meet eligibility criteria because exposure and outcome were not measured at the individual level. Meta-analyses of human data resulted in overall meta relative risks of 1.08 (95% CI: 0.96-1.21) including all studies and 1.03 (95%CI: 0.84-1.26) excluding studies associated with the highest risk of bias. Because most occupational studies have high risk of bias for confounding and exposure domains, the overall confidence in this evidence base is low to moderate. Combining the streams of evidence per the OHAT approach, Cr(VI) does not pose a stomach cancer hazard in humans.

Pridružite se našoj
facebook stranici

Najkompletnija baza ljekovitog bilja potpomognuta znanošću

  • Radi na 55 jezika
  • Biljni lijekovi potpomognuti znanošću
  • Prepoznavanje bilja slikom
  • Interaktivna GPS karta - označite bilje na mjestu (uskoro)
  • Pročitajte znanstvene publikacije povezane s vašom pretragom
  • Pretražite ljekovito bilje po učincima
  • Organizirajte svoje interese i budite u toku s istraživanjem vijesti, kliničkim ispitivanjima i patentima

Upišite simptom ili bolest i pročitajte o biljkama koje bi mogle pomoći, unesite travu i pogledajte bolesti i simptome protiv kojih se koristi.
* Svi podaci temelje se na objavljenim znanstvenim istraživanjima

Google Play badgeApp Store badge