Albanian
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Belarusian
Bengali
Bosnian
Catalan
Czech
Danish
Deutsch
Dutch
English
Estonian
Finnish
Français
Greek
Haitian Creole
Hebrew
Hindi
Hungarian
Icelandic
Indonesian
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Latvian
Lithuanian
Macedonian
Mongolian
Norwegian
Persian
Polish
Portuguese
Romanian
Russian
Serbian
Slovak
Slovenian
Spanish
Swahili
Swedish
Turkish
Ukrainian
Vietnamese
Български
中文(简体)
中文(繁體)
American Journal of Cardiology 2018-Nov

The Metabolic Syndrome, Cardiovascular Fitness and Survival in Patients With Advanced Systolic Heart Failure.

Samo registrirani korisnici mogu prevoditi članke
Prijava Registriraj se
Veza se sprema u međuspremnik
Amanda Ruth Vest
James Bernard Young
Leslie Cho

Ključne riječi

Sažetak

The metabolic syndrome (MetS), which incorporates insulin resistance, visceral adiposity, and dyslipidemia, is an independent risk factor for incident heart failure (HF), but the impact on survival is uncertain. We sought to determine the relation between the metabolic syndrome and survival in ambulatory systolic HF patients and the impact of MetS on cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET). We identified adults with ejection fraction ≤40% who underwent CPETs between 2000 and 2011. Baseline MetS status was defined by 3 or more of: (1) Triglycerides ≥150 mg/dl; (2) High density lipoprotein <40 mg/dl males or <50 mg/dl females; (3) Diabetes mellitus; (4) Hypertension; (5) Body mass index ≥35 kg/m2. Minimally-adjusted (for age, sex, transplantation and left ventricular assist device implantation) and fully-adjusted Cox proportional hazards models were constructed for all-cause mortality. MetS prevalence was 37% (716 of 1,953) and median follow-up 5 years. Mortality was 36% for +MetS and 29% for -MetS (p = 0.006), with highest mortality in the subgroup with both MetS plus diabetes (39%). The minimally-adjusted hazard ratio for mortality with MetS was 1.27 (95% confidence interval, 1.08 to 1.49, p = 0.004). After adjustment, MetS was no longer independently associated with mortality (hazard ratio 1.01, 95% confidence interval 0.85 to 1.19, p = 0.921). Patients with MetS achieved poorer CPET performance compared and MetS was independently associated with a lower peak VO2. MetS was associated with a higher hazard of mortality in the minimally-adjusted model, which was primarily driven by the unfavorable impact of diabetes on mortality, but this association was no longer significant after full adjustment. In conclusion, there was no independent association between MetS and survival in an ambulatory systolic HF population.

Pridružite se našoj
facebook stranici

Najkompletnija baza ljekovitog bilja potpomognuta znanošću

  • Radi na 55 jezika
  • Biljni lijekovi potpomognuti znanošću
  • Prepoznavanje bilja slikom
  • Interaktivna GPS karta - označite bilje na mjestu (uskoro)
  • Pročitajte znanstvene publikacije povezane s vašom pretragom
  • Pretražite ljekovito bilje po učincima
  • Organizirajte svoje interese i budite u toku s istraživanjem vijesti, kliničkim ispitivanjima i patentima

Upišite simptom ili bolest i pročitajte o biljkama koje bi mogle pomoći, unesite travu i pogledajte bolesti i simptome protiv kojih se koristi.
* Svi podaci temelje se na objavljenim znanstvenim istraživanjima

Google Play badgeApp Store badge