Haitian Creole
Albanian
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Belarusian
Bengali
Bosnian
Catalan
Czech
Danish
Deutsch
Dutch
English
Estonian
Finnish
Français
Greek
Haitian Creole
Hebrew
Hindi
Hungarian
Icelandic
Indonesian
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Latvian
Lithuanian
Macedonian
Mongolian
Norwegian
Persian
Polish
Portuguese
Romanian
Russian
Serbian
Slovak
Slovenian
Spanish
Swahili
Swedish
Turkish
Ukrainian
Vietnamese
Български
中文(简体)
中文(繁體)
Nurse Education Today 2015-Dec

Comparison of standardized patients with high-fidelity simulators for managing stress and improving performance in clinical deterioration: A mixed methods study.

Se sèlman itilizatè ki anrejistre yo ki ka tradwi atik yo
Log In / Enskri
Lyen an sove nan clipboard la
Jeanette Ignacio
Diana Dolmans
Albert Scherpbier
Jan-Joost Rethans
Sally Chan
Sok Ying Liaw

Mo kle

Abstrè

BACKGROUND

The use of standardized patients in deteriorating patient simulations adds realism that can be valuable for preparing nurse trainees for stress and enhancing their performance during actual patient deterioration. Emotional engagement resulting from increased fidelity can provide additional stress for student nurses with limited exposure to real patients. To determine the presence of increased stress with the standardized patient modality, this study compared the use of standardized patients (SP) with the use of high-fidelity simulators (HFS) during deteriorating patient simulations. Performance in managing deteriorating patients was also compared. It also explored student nurses' insights on the use of standardized patients and patient simulators in deteriorating patient simulations as preparation for clinical placement.

METHODS

Fifty-seven student nurses participated in a randomized controlled design study with pre- and post-tests to evaluate stress and performance in deteriorating patient simulations. Performance was assessed using the Rescuing A Patient in Deteriorating Situations (RAPIDS) rating tool. Stress was measured using salivary alpha-amylase levels. Fourteen participants who joined the randomized controlled component then participated in focus group discussions that elicited their insights on SP use in patient deterioration simulations.

RESULTS

Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) results showed no significant difference (p=0.744) between the performance scores of the SP and HFS groups in managing deteriorating patients. Amylase levels were also not significantly different (p=0.317) between the two groups. Stress in simulation, awareness of patient interactions, and realism were the main themes that resulted from the thematic analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Performance and stress in deteriorating patient simulations with standardized patients did not vary from similar simulations using high-fidelity patient simulators. Data from focus group interviews, however, suggested that the use of standardized patients was perceived to be valuable in preparing students for actual patient deterioration management.

Antre nan paj
facebook nou an

Baz done ki pi konplè remèd fèy medsin te apiye nan syans

  • Travay nan 55 lang
  • Geri èrbal te apiye nan syans
  • Remèd fèy rekonesans pa imaj
  • Kat entèaktif GPS - tag zèb sou kote (vini byento)
  • Li piblikasyon syantifik ki gen rapò ak rechèch ou an
  • Search remèd fèy medsin pa efè yo
  • Izeganize enterè ou yo ak rete kanpe fè dat ak rechèch la nouvèl, esè klinik ak rive

Tape yon sentòm oswa yon maladi epi li sou remèd fèy ki ta ka ede, tape yon zèb ak wè maladi ak sentòm li itilize kont.
* Tout enfòmasyon baze sou rechèch syantifik pibliye

Google Play badgeApp Store badge