Haitian Creole
Albanian
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Belarusian
Bengali
Bosnian
Catalan
Czech
Danish
Deutsch
Dutch
English
Estonian
Finnish
Français
Greek
Haitian Creole
Hebrew
Hindi
Hungarian
Icelandic
Indonesian
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Latvian
Lithuanian
Macedonian
Mongolian
Norwegian
Persian
Polish
Portuguese
Romanian
Russian
Serbian
Slovak
Slovenian
Spanish
Swahili
Swedish
Turkish
Ukrainian
Vietnamese
Български
中文(简体)
中文(繁體)
Archives of neurology 2010-Jul

Risk factors and presentations of periventricular venous infarction vs arterial presumed perinatal ischemic stroke.

Se sèlman itilizatè ki anrejistre yo ki ka tradwi atik yo
Log In / Enskri
Lyen an sove nan clipboard la
Adam Kirton
Manohar Shroff
Ann-Marie Pontigon
Gabrielle deVeber

Mo kle

Abstrè

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether clinical presentations and risk factor profiles differ between periventricular venous infarction (PVI) and arterial presumed perinatal ischemic stroke (APPIS).

METHODS

Retrospective cohort study.

METHODS

A total of 59 children with presumed perinatal ischemic stroke (PPIS) from the SickKids Children's Stroke Program who were carried to term (63% boys).

METHODS

Single tertiary care center subspecialty program.

METHODS

Participants had validated magnetic resonance imaging classification to define PVI and APPIS subgroups.

METHODS

Clinical presentations, times to parental and physician concern, age at diagnosis, and standardized risk factor evaluations including maternal, fetal, obstetrical, neonatal, and prothrombotic variables. Patients with PVI and APPIS were compared using chi(2) or Fisher exact tests and Wilcoxon rank sum or Mann-Whitney U tests.

RESULTS

A total of 12 children (20%) had PVI and 47 (80%) had APPIS. Median parental concern was 5 months, with delays to physician concern (7 months) and diagnosis (12 months). Delays were longer in PVI cases compared with APPIS (P = .002). Most presented with asymmetrical motor development but children with APPIS were more likely to present with seizures or nonmotor delays (P = .01). Children with APPIS were more likely to have acute perinatal risk factors (66% vs 17%; P = .002) including fetal distress, emergency caesarian section, or neonatal resuscitation. Cardiac evaluations were unremarkable. Prothrombotic abnormalities were common (44%) including protein S deficiency, lupus anticoagulant, and elevated factor IX but were comparable between APPIS and PVI subgroups.

CONCLUSIONS

Diagnosis of PPIS is often delayed. The association of acute perinatal risk factors with APPIS compared with PVI supports distinct timing of these diseases. Prospective, case-control risk factor studies of PPIS subtypes are required to develop prevention strategies.

Antre nan paj
facebook nou an

Baz done ki pi konplè remèd fèy medsin te apiye nan syans

  • Travay nan 55 lang
  • Geri èrbal te apiye nan syans
  • Remèd fèy rekonesans pa imaj
  • Kat entèaktif GPS - tag zèb sou kote (vini byento)
  • Li piblikasyon syantifik ki gen rapò ak rechèch ou an
  • Search remèd fèy medsin pa efè yo
  • Izeganize enterè ou yo ak rete kanpe fè dat ak rechèch la nouvèl, esè klinik ak rive

Tape yon sentòm oswa yon maladi epi li sou remèd fèy ki ta ka ede, tape yon zèb ak wè maladi ak sentòm li itilize kont.
* Tout enfòmasyon baze sou rechèch syantifik pibliye

Google Play badgeApp Store badge