Hungarian
Albanian
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Belarusian
Bengali
Bosnian
Catalan
Czech
Danish
Deutsch
Dutch
English
Estonian
Finnish
Français
Greek
Haitian Creole
Hebrew
Hindi
Hungarian
Icelandic
Indonesian
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Latvian
Lithuanian
Macedonian
Mongolian
Norwegian
Persian
Polish
Portuguese
Romanian
Russian
Serbian
Slovak
Slovenian
Spanish
Swahili
Swedish
Turkish
Ukrainian
Vietnamese
Български
中文(简体)
中文(繁體)
PLoS ONE 2020-Aug

A comparison of PTI defense profiles induced in Solanum tuberosum by PAMP and non-PAMP elicitors shows distinct, elicitor-specific responses

Csak regisztrált felhasználók fordíthatnak cikkeket
Belépés Regisztrálás
A hivatkozás a vágólapra kerül
Rafaela Martin
Pauline Boulch
Pauline Clin
Adrián Schwarzenberg
Jean-Claude Yvin
Didier Andrivon
Eric Nguema-Ona
Florence Val

Kulcsszavak

Absztrakt

The induction of general plant defense responses following the perception of external elicitors is now regarded as the first level of the plant immune response. Depending on the involvement or not of these molecules in pathogenicity, this induction of defense is called either Pathogen-Associated Molecular Pattern (PAMP) Triggered Immunity or Pattern Triggered Immunity-both abbreviated to PTI. Because PTI is assumed to be a widespread and stable form of resistance to infection, understanding the mechanisms driving it becomes a major goal for the sustainable management of plant-pathogen interactions. However, the induction of PTI is complex. Our hypotheses are that (i) the recognition by the plant of PAMPs vs non-PAMP elicitors leads to specific defense profiles and (ii) the responses specifically induced by PAMPs target critical life history traits of the pathogen that produced them. We thus analyzed, using a metabolomic approach coupled with transcriptomic and hormonal analyses, the defense profiles induced in potato foliage treated with either a Concentrated Culture Filtrate (CCF) from Phytophthora infestans or two non-PAMP preparations, β-aminobutyric acid (BABA) and an Ulva spp. Extract, used separately. Each elicitor induced specific defense profiles. CCF up-regulated sesquiterpenes but down-regulated sterols and phenols, notably α-chaconine, caffeoyl quinic acid and rutin, which decreased spore production of P. infestans in vitro. CCF thus induces both defense and counter-defense responses. By contrast, the Ulva extract triggered the synthesis of a large-spectrum of antimicrobial compounds through the phenylpropanoid/flavonoid pathways, while BABA targeted the primary metabolism. Hence, PTI can be regarded as a heterogeneous set of general and pathogen-specific responses triggered by the molecular signatures of each elicitor, rather than as a uniform, non-specific and broad-spectrum set of general defense reactions.

Csatlakozzon
facebook oldalunkhoz

A legteljesebb gyógynövény-adatbázis, amelyet a tudomány támogat

  • Működik 55 nyelven
  • A tudomány által támogatott gyógynövényes kúrák
  • Gyógynövények felismerése kép alapján
  • Interaktív GPS térkép - jelölje meg a gyógynövényeket a helyszínen (hamarosan)
  • Olvassa el a keresésével kapcsolatos tudományos publikációkat
  • Keresse meg a gyógynövényeket hatásuk szerint
  • Szervezze meg érdeklődését, és naprakész legyen a hírkutatással, a klinikai vizsgálatokkal és a szabadalmakkal

Írjon be egy tünetet vagy betegséget, és olvassa el azokat a gyógynövényeket, amelyek segíthetnek, beírhat egy gyógynövényt, és megtekintheti azokat a betegségeket és tüneteket, amelyek ellen használják.
* Minden információ publikált tudományos kutatáson alapul

Google Play badgeApp Store badge