Indonesian
Albanian
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Belarusian
Bengali
Bosnian
Catalan
Czech
Danish
Deutsch
Dutch
English
Estonian
Finnish
Français
Greek
Haitian Creole
Hebrew
Hindi
Hungarian
Icelandic
Indonesian
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Latvian
Lithuanian
Macedonian
Mongolian
Norwegian
Persian
Polish
Portuguese
Romanian
Russian
Serbian
Slovak
Slovenian
Spanish
Swahili
Swedish
Turkish
Ukrainian
Vietnamese
Български
中文(简体)
中文(繁體)
Journal of Clinical Anesthesia 2012-Mar

Anesthetic and recovery profiles of lidocaine versus mepivacaine for spinal anesthesia in patients undergoing outpatient orthopedic arthroscopic procedures.

Hanya pengguna terdaftar yang dapat menerjemahkan artikel
Masuk daftar
Tautan disimpan ke clipboard
Julius Pawlowski
Kevin Orr
Ku-Mie Kim
Ana Lucia Pappas
Radha Sukhani
W Scott Jellish

Kata kunci

Abstrak

OBJECTIVE

To compare isobaric lidocaine and mepivacaine in outpatient arthroscopic surgery.

METHODS

Prospective, randomized, double-blinded study.

METHODS

Ambulatory surgery center affiliated with an academic tertiary-care hospital.

METHODS

84 adult, ASA physical status 1, 2, and 3 ambulatory patients, age 18-70 years, undergoing arthroscopic knee surgery.

METHODS

Patients were randomized to receive a combination spinal-epidural anesthetic using 80 mg of either isobaric 2% mepivacaine or isobaric 2% lidocaine. Patients also received a femoral 3-in-1 block with 0.5% bupivacaine applied to the affected extremity.

METHODS

Demographic data and level and duration of the block were recorded. The use of supplemental epidural anesthesia was noted along with frequency of bradycardia, hypotension, and episodes of nausea and vomiting. Duration of block and times to ambulation and voiding were recorded. Delayed variables, including fatigue, difficulty urinating, back pain, and transient neurologic symptoms (TNS) were obtained.

RESULTS

No demographic differences were noted between groups, and surgical duration was similar. Satisfactory anesthesia was achieved in all cases, with no differences noted in hypotension, bradycardia, nausea, or vomiting. Onset of sensory and motor block was similar. Duration of block before epidural supplementation was 94 ± 21 minutes with lidocaine versus 122 ± 23 minutes for mepivacaine (P < 0.011). Times to ambulation and voiding were longer in patients receiving mepivacaine but did not affect PACU stay. Twenty-four and 48-hour recovery was similar with no TNS symptoms reported.

CONCLUSIONS

No major differences were noted between lidocaine and mepivacaine spinal anesthesia. Time to ambulation and voiding were longer in patients who received mepivacaine as was time to first dose of epidural catheter. Neither group had TNS symptoms. Lidocaine and mepivacaine are both appropriate spinal anesthetics for ambulatory orthopedic lower extremity procedures.

Bergabunglah dengan
halaman facebook kami

Database tanaman obat terlengkap yang didukung oleh sains

  • Bekerja dalam 55 bahasa
  • Pengobatan herbal didukung oleh sains
  • Pengenalan herbal melalui gambar
  • Peta GPS interaktif - beri tag herba di lokasi (segera hadir)
  • Baca publikasi ilmiah yang terkait dengan pencarian Anda
  • Cari tanaman obat berdasarkan efeknya
  • Atur minat Anda dan ikuti perkembangan berita, uji klinis, dan paten

Ketikkan gejala atau penyakit dan baca tentang jamu yang mungkin membantu, ketik jamu dan lihat penyakit dan gejala yang digunakan untuk melawannya.
* Semua informasi didasarkan pada penelitian ilmiah yang dipublikasikan

Google Play badgeApp Store badge