Italian
Albanian
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Belarusian
Bengali
Bosnian
Catalan
Czech
Danish
Deutsch
Dutch
English
Estonian
Finnish
Français
Greek
Haitian Creole
Hebrew
Hindi
Hungarian
Icelandic
Indonesian
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Latvian
Lithuanian
Macedonian
Mongolian
Norwegian
Persian
Polish
Portuguese
Romanian
Russian
Serbian
Slovak
Slovenian
Spanish
Swahili
Swedish
Turkish
Ukrainian
Vietnamese
Български
中文(简体)
中文(繁體)
Ai zheng = Aizheng = Chinese journal of cancer 2006-Aug

[A randomized comparative trial of three combined regimens containing cisplatin for treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer].

Solo gli utenti registrati possono tradurre articoli
Entra registrati
Il collegamento viene salvato negli appunti
Lian Liu
Xiu-Wen Wang
Li Li
Xin Zhang
Wen-Dong Zhang
Xue-Jun Yu

Parole chiave

Astratto

OBJECTIVE

Vinorelbine (NVB), paclitaxel (TAX), and gemcitabine (GEM) are first-line chemotherapeutic drugs in the treatment for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) currently. There are many domestically retrospective studies to compare efficacies and adverse reactions among these three regimens, all of which has composed of cisplatin (DDP). This randomized study was to investigate the efficacies and toxicities of these three regimens in NSCLC treatment, in order to choose a feasible regimen for NSCLC patients.

METHODS

A total of 276 NSCLC patients were randomly assigned to a regimen of NP (NVB plus DDP ), or TP (TAX plus DDP), or GP (GEM plus DDP). Efficacies and toxicities were analyzed and compared after two cycles.

RESULTS

The response rates were 42.3% (41/97) in NP arm, 43.0% (40/93) in TP arm, and 43.4% (36/83) in GP arm, and complete remission rates were 1.0% (1/97), 2.2% (1/93) and (0/83) respectively, without significant difference. The median survival time, disease-free survival time and 1-year survival rate were 8.5 months, 4.1 months and 31.9%; 8.8 months, 3.8 months and 33.3%, and 9.2 months, 3.9 months, 31.3%, respectively in NP, TP and GP arms without significant difference. The major adverse reactions were stage 3 to 4 myelo-suppression, nausea/vomiting, fatigue and phlebitis. There were highest incidences of leucopenia (42.2%), neutropenia (36.2%) and lowest incidence of thrombocytopenia (53.0%) in GP arm compared to NP arm (77.8%, 67.7%, 12.1%) or TP arm (71.0%, 57.0%, 13.0%) statistically (P<0.01 for all). The rates of nausea/vomiting in GP arm (16.8%) and TP arm (25.8%) were significantly lower than in NP arm (41.4%)(P<0.05); and the rate of fatigue in GP arm (38.5%) or phlebitis in NP arm was most frequent among the three arms (P=0.000, 0.008 respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

There is no significant difference in short-term efficacy of chemotherapy regimen NP, TP and GP. TP and GP regimens, both of which possesses its own advantage, are more tolerable than NP regimen which has the most side effects.

Unisciti alla nostra
pagina facebook

Il database di erbe medicinali più completo supportato dalla scienza

  • Funziona in 55 lingue
  • Cure a base di erbe sostenute dalla scienza
  • Riconoscimento delle erbe per immagine
  • Mappa GPS interattiva - tagga le erbe sul luogo (disponibile a breve)
  • Leggi le pubblicazioni scientifiche relative alla tua ricerca
  • Cerca le erbe medicinali in base ai loro effetti
  • Organizza i tuoi interessi e tieniti aggiornato sulle notizie di ricerca, sperimentazioni cliniche e brevetti

Digita un sintomo o una malattia e leggi le erbe che potrebbero aiutare, digita un'erba e osserva le malattie ei sintomi contro cui è usata.
* Tutte le informazioni si basano su ricerche scientifiche pubblicate

Google Play badgeApp Store badge