Italian
Albanian
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Belarusian
Bengali
Bosnian
Catalan
Czech
Danish
Deutsch
Dutch
English
Estonian
Finnish
Français
Greek
Haitian Creole
Hebrew
Hindi
Hungarian
Icelandic
Indonesian
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Latvian
Lithuanian
Macedonian
Mongolian
Norwegian
Persian
Polish
Portuguese
Romanian
Russian
Serbian
Slovak
Slovenian
Spanish
Swahili
Swedish
Turkish
Ukrainian
Vietnamese
Български
中文(简体)
中文(繁體)
International Journal of Cancer 2013-May

Tobacco smoking and risk of multiple myeloma: a meta-analysis of 40 observational studies.

Solo gli utenti registrati possono tradurre articoli
Entra registrati
Il collegamento viene salvato negli appunti
Theodora Psaltopoulou
Theodoros N Sergentanis
Nick Kanellias
Prodromos Kanavidis
Evangelos Terpos
Meletios A Dimopoulos

Parole chiave

Astratto

This meta-analysis aims to quantitatively synthesize all available data on the association between tobacco smoking and multiple myeloma (MM) risk. Eligible studies were identified and pooled effect estimates (odds ratios and relative risks) were calculated regarding ever, current and former smoking. Separate analyses were performed on case-control and cohort studies, as well as on males and females. Meta-regression analysis with percentage of males, mean age, years of smoking, pack-years, cigarettes per day, years since quit and age at onset was performed. Forty articles were deemed eligible; of them 27 used a case-control design (4,625 cases and 21,591 controls) and 13 used a cohort design (2,228 incident cases among a total cohort size equal to 1,852,763 subjects). Ever smoking was not associated with MM risk (pooled effect estimate = 0.92, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.85-1.00); similar results were obtained for current (pooled effect estimate = 0.87, 95% CI: 0.74-1.03) and former smoking (pooled effect estimate = 1.04, 95% CI: 0.96-1.13). Regarding ever smoking, the null association was reproducible upon cohort studies (pooled effect estimate = 1.01, 95%CI: 0.89-1.15), whereas the inverse association in case-control studies (pooled effect estimate = 0.87, 95% CI: 0.78-0.96) was particularly due to the bias-prone hospital-based ones. Meta-regression analysis did not yield statistically significant results. In conclusion, MM does not seem to be associated with tobacco smoking. There is a need to further explore how molecular mechanisms are involved in the resistance of MM progenitor cells toward smoking.

Unisciti alla nostra
pagina facebook

Il database di erbe medicinali più completo supportato dalla scienza

  • Funziona in 55 lingue
  • Cure a base di erbe sostenute dalla scienza
  • Riconoscimento delle erbe per immagine
  • Mappa GPS interattiva - tagga le erbe sul luogo (disponibile a breve)
  • Leggi le pubblicazioni scientifiche relative alla tua ricerca
  • Cerca le erbe medicinali in base ai loro effetti
  • Organizza i tuoi interessi e tieniti aggiornato sulle notizie di ricerca, sperimentazioni cliniche e brevetti

Digita un sintomo o una malattia e leggi le erbe che potrebbero aiutare, digita un'erba e osserva le malattie ei sintomi contro cui è usata.
* Tutte le informazioni si basano su ricerche scientifiche pubblicate

Google Play badgeApp Store badge