Hebrew
Albanian
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Belarusian
Bengali
Bosnian
Catalan
Czech
Danish
Deutsch
Dutch
English
Estonian
Finnish
Français
Greek
Haitian Creole
Hebrew
Hindi
Hungarian
Icelandic
Indonesian
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Latvian
Lithuanian
Macedonian
Mongolian
Norwegian
Persian
Polish
Portuguese
Romanian
Russian
Serbian
Slovak
Slovenian
Spanish
Swahili
Swedish
Turkish
Ukrainian
Vietnamese
Български
中文(简体)
中文(繁體)
Journal of Craniofacial Surgery 2016-Nov

Minimally Invasive Strip Craniectomy Simplifies Anesthesia Practice in Patients With Isolated Sagittal Synostosis.

רק משתמשים רשומים יכולים לתרגם מאמרים
התחבר הרשם
הקישור נשמר בלוח
Daan P F van Nunen
Bart M Stubenitsky
Peter A Woerdeman
Kuo Sen Han
Corstiaan C Breugem
Aebele B Mink van der Molen
Jurgen C de Graaff

מילות מפתח

תַקצִיר

BACKGROUND

Traditional open corrective surgery for isolated sagittal synostosis entails significant blood loss, transfusion rates, morbidity, and a lengthy hospitalization. Minimally invasive strip craniectomy (MISC) was introduced to avoid the disadvantages of open techniques.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was, first, to compare the anesthesia practice in MISC and open extended strip craniectomy (OESC), and, second, to evaluate the incidence of perioperative complications in both surgical procedures.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted for all consecutive patients receiving either OESC or MISC for nonsyndromic isolated sagittal synostosis between January 2006 and February 2014. The primary endpoints were the volume of blood loss, the volume of infused blood products, the duration of surgery, the anesthesia time, the intubation time, and the length of admission to high care units and the hospital.

RESULTS

In MISC, the median duration of surgery (90 versus 178 min.), anesthesia time (178 versus 291 min), and intubation time (153 versus 294 min) were all significantly (P < 0.001) shorter than in OESC. Intraoperative blood loss was less in MISC than in OESC (3.8 versus 29.7 mL/kg, P < 0.001), requiring less crystalloids (33.3 versus 76.9 mL/kg, P < 0.001) as well as less erythrocyte transfusions (0.0 versus 19.7 mL/kg, P < 0.001) in a smaller number of patients (2/20 versus 13/15). The improved hemodynamic stability in MISC allowed for placement of less arterial and central venous catheters. After OESC all 15 patients were admitted to high care units, compared with 9 of 20 in MISC. The overall median hospital stay was shorter in MISC than in OESC (4 versus 6 d, P < 0.001). Although the incidence of technical complications was similar in both techniques, patients in MISC were less affected by perioperative electrolyte and acid-base disturbances and postoperative pyrexia.

CONCLUSIONS

Minimally invasive strip craniectomy simplifies anesthesia practice relative to OESC with shorter operative times, decreased needs for replacement fluids and blood products, lessened requirements for invasive monitoring, and reduced demands for postoperative high care beds.

הצטרפו לדף הפייסבוק שלנו

המאגר השלם ביותר של צמחי מרפא המגובה על ידי המדע

  • עובד ב 55 שפות
  • מרפא צמחי מרפא מגובה על ידי מדע
  • זיהוי עשבי תיבול על ידי דימוי
  • מפת GPS אינטראקטיבית - תייגו עשבי תיבול במיקום (בקרוב)
  • קרא פרסומים מדעיים הקשורים לחיפוש שלך
  • חפש עשבי מרפא על פי השפעותיהם
  • ארגן את תחומי העניין שלך והתעדכן במחקר החדשות, הניסויים הקליניים והפטנטים

הקלד סימפטום או מחלה וקרא על צמחי מרפא שעשויים לעזור, הקלד עשב וראה מחלות ותסמינים שהוא משמש נגד.
* כל המידע מבוסס על מחקר מדעי שפורסם

Google Play badgeApp Store badge