Japanese
Albanian
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Belarusian
Bengali
Bosnian
Catalan
Czech
Danish
Deutsch
Dutch
English
Estonian
Finnish
Français
Greek
Haitian Creole
Hebrew
Hindi
Hungarian
Icelandic
Indonesian
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Latvian
Lithuanian
Macedonian
Mongolian
Norwegian
Persian
Polish
Portuguese
Romanian
Russian
Serbian
Slovak
Slovenian
Spanish
Swahili
Swedish
Turkish
Ukrainian
Vietnamese
Български
中文(简体)
中文(繁體)
Therapeutic Apheresis and Dialysis 2007-Jun

Effects of HELP therapy on acute ischemic stroke and vascular endothelial cell function.

登録ユーザーのみが記事を翻訳できます
ログインサインアップ
リンクがクリップボードに保存されます
Jun Xue
Qiang Dong
Xiang Han
Huaizhou You
Yong Gu
Shanyan Lin

キーワード

概要

To evaluate the therapeutic effects of the HELP system (heparin-induced extracorporeal low-density lipoprotein-apolipoprotein(a)-fibrinogen precipitation) in patients with acute ischemic stroke and probe into its possible mechanism, 10 patients with acute ischemic stroke were included in this study and received the HELP therapy in addition to low molecular weight dextran, salvia miltiorrhiza and aspirin. Matched with gender, age, European Stroke Scale (ESS) and fibrinogen, 20 patients with cerebral infarction treated with low molecular heparin were chosen as controls during the same period. We compared the efficacy and prognosis between the two groups. In order to clarify the effects of HELP treatment on endothelial function, human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC) were cultured with the serum of pre- and post-HELP therapy and control patients, then endothelial permeability and biomarkers of endothelial dysfunction or activation in the supernatant of incubated HUVEC, such as soluble thrombomodulin (sTM), soluble intracellular adhesion molecule-1 (sICAM-1) and monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1), were tested. Twenty-one days after treatment, ESS scores in the HELP group (70.4 +/- 23.06) were higher than those in control group (60.7 +/- 18.94), but there was no statistical significance (P > 0.05). In the HELP group, total efficacy rate reached 60% with ESS score (6 cases of recovery and efficacy, 4 cases of inefficacy), while it was 40% in control group (8 cases of recovery and efficacy, 12 cases of inefficacy), but unfortunately there was no significant difference between both groups using the chi(2)-test (P > 0.05). Interestingly, with the activities of daily living (ADL) score, the efficacy rate in the HELP group (60%) was markedly higher than that in the control group (20%) (P < 0.05). Furthermore, Pearson correlation analysis showed that the therapeutic window (the time from the patient's onset to receiving the therapy) was correlated to final ADL scores (P = 0.044) and the mean therapeutic window was 14.08 +/- 3.41 h in patients who achieved efficacy criteria. After therapy, no difference was found in hemorheology, fibrinogen, blood lipid, oxidized low-density lipoprotein (oxLDL) or C-reactive protein (CRP) in the control group, while there was a significant decrease in the HELP group immediately after treatment (P < 0.01). But the hospital stay time was similar between the HELP group and the controls (23.11 +/- 10.65 vs. 21.53 +/- 8.73 days; P > 0.05) and 21 days later, the dimension of the largest cross-sectioned infarction area by CT scan did not significantly change for the two groups' of patients (P > 0.05). When cultured with the patient's serum after HELP therapy, the concentration of sTM, sICAM-1, and MCP-1 in the supernatant of cultured HUVEC remained unchanged at 24 h (P > 0.05), while it was remarkably higher when HUVEC was cultured with the serum of the controls and patients before HELP therapy (P < 0.01), except for sTM. The endothelial permeability was also improved after the HELP treatment. With the effects of improving hemorheology, decreasing acute phase reactive proteins such as CRP and fibrinogen, ameliorating endothelial cell function, HELP system may be a novel therapy for acute ischemic stroke.

Facebookページに参加する

科学に裏打ちされた最も完全な薬草データベース

  • 55の言語で動作します
  • 科学に裏打ちされたハーブ療法
  • 画像によるハーブの認識
  • インタラクティブGPSマップ-場所にハーブをタグ付け(近日公開)
  • 検索に関連する科学出版物を読む
  • それらの効果によって薬草を検索する
  • あなたの興味を整理し、ニュース研究、臨床試験、特許について最新情報を入手してください

症状や病気を入力し、役立つ可能性のあるハーブについて読み、ハーブを入力して、それが使用されている病気や症状を確認します。
*すべての情報は公開された科学的研究に基づいています

Google Play badgeApp Store badge