Japanese
Albanian
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Belarusian
Bengali
Bosnian
Catalan
Czech
Danish
Deutsch
Dutch
English
Estonian
Finnish
Français
Greek
Haitian Creole
Hebrew
Hindi
Hungarian
Icelandic
Indonesian
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Latvian
Lithuanian
Macedonian
Mongolian
Norwegian
Persian
Polish
Portuguese
Romanian
Russian
Serbian
Slovak
Slovenian
Spanish
Swahili
Swedish
Turkish
Ukrainian
Vietnamese
Български
中文(简体)
中文(繁體)
European Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology 2010-Nov

Effects of intestinal intervention on bacterial translocation in a rat model of acute liver failure in vivo.

登録ユーザーのみが記事を翻訳できます
ログインサインアップ
リンクがクリップボードに保存されます
Jie Yang
Qing-He Nie
An-Hui Wang
Xiao-Feng Huang
Qing-Quan Liu
Yun-Ming Li

キーワード

概要

OBJECTIVE

The study aimed to confirm bacterial translocation (BT) in rats with acute liver failure (ALF), to explore the correlation between the concentration of lipopolysaccharides and Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) expression, and further, to evaluate the curative effects of lactulose and montmorillonite (smecta) in this setting.

METHODS

D-Galactosamine was injected into the abdominal cavity of rats to induce ALF. Escherichia coli JM109 labeled with enhanced green fluorescent protein was administered to track BT. Simultaneously, the rats were given lactulose or smecta. Blood samples were collected for measuring liver function, cytokines, endotoxins, and TLR4 expression. Representative tissue specimens from the liver, spleen, and mesenteric lymph nodes were aseptically harvested for bacterial identification by agarose gel electrophoresis, laser scanning confocal microscopy, and flow cytometry.

RESULTS

BT occurred in ALF, accompanied by impaired liver function with increased cytokines, endotoxins, and TLR4 expression. After the treatment with lactulose or smecta, all these parameters decreased, including the relative quantity of translocated bacteria while albumin increased. Furthermore, compared with the lactulose treatment group, the parameters in the smecta treatment group improved. Moreover, in the group in which smecta was given for prophylaxis, there was greater improvement than with treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Intestinal intervention with lactulose or smecta can ameliorate BT; moreover, smecta has a better effect than lactulose, and its preventive effect was also better than its therapeutic effect.

Facebookページに参加する

科学に裏打ちされた最も完全な薬草データベース

  • 55の言語で動作します
  • 科学に裏打ちされたハーブ療法
  • 画像によるハーブの認識
  • インタラクティブGPSマップ-場所にハーブをタグ付け(近日公開)
  • 検索に関連する科学出版物を読む
  • それらの効果によって薬草を検索する
  • あなたの興味を整理し、ニュース研究、臨床試験、特許について最新情報を入手してください

症状や病気を入力し、役立つ可能性のあるハーブについて読み、ハーブを入力して、それが使用されている病気や症状を確認します。
*すべての情報は公開された科学的研究に基づいています

Google Play badgeApp Store badge