Pentosan polysulfate therapy for chronic nonbacterial prostatitis (chronic pelvic pain syndrome category IIIA): a prospective multicenter clinical trial.
キーワード
概要
OBJECTIVE
Chronic nonbacterial prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CPPS) has clinical and perhaps etiologic characteristics similar to interstitial cystitis. Pentosan polysulfate sodium (PPS), an oral medication indicated for the treatment of interstitial cystitis, has shown moderate benefit in reducing chronic pelvic pain and voiding symptoms in patients with interstitial cystitis. We undertook a prospective open-label, multicenter Phase II pilot study to examine the potential efficacy of PPS in the treatment of CPPS in men, using outcome tools validated for CPPS in men.
METHODS
Patients with a diagnosis consistent with National Institutes of Health (NIH) CPPS category IIIA (inflammatory) were treated with PPS, 100 mg three times daily, for 6 months. The evaluation at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months consisted of the Symptom Severity Index, a Symptom Frequency Questionnaire, the NIH-Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Pain Index (NIH-CPSI), a quality-of-life assessment, and a subjective global assessment.
RESULTS
Thirty-two patients (mean age 45.5 +/- 11 years; duration of symptoms 9.2 +/- 12 years) were enrolled in five centers; 28 patients were available for evaluation. Seven patients experienced drug-related side effects, including hair loss (n = 2), headache (n = 2), mild nausea (n = 1), mild weight gain (n = 1), and skin flushing (n = 1). The decrease in frequency (Symptom Frequency Questionnaire 28.1 to 17.9), severity (Symptom Severity Index 53.6 to 36.3), and combined location/frequency/severity of pain (NIH-CPSI pain 14.5 to 9.2) symptom scores at 6 months compared with baseline was significant. The decrease was associated with a significant improvement in patients' quality of life (quality-of-life assessment 5.3 to 3.8). Forty-three percent of the patients had a greater than 50% improvement in the Symptom Frequency Questionnaire, Symptom Severity Index, and NIH-CPSI (rated as clinically significant improvement). At 6 months, mild, moderate, and marked improvement was noted (subjective global assessment) by 33%, 19%, and 15% of the patients, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS
PPS is well tolerated and appears to have efficacy in reducing the severity and frequency of general symptoms, reducing specific pain symptoms, and improving the quality of life in many male patients with CPPS. The results of this study justify the initiation of a randomized controlled trial comparing the safety and efficacy of PPS to placebo.
