Korean
Albanian
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Belarusian
Bengali
Bosnian
Catalan
Czech
Danish
Deutsch
Dutch
English
Estonian
Finnish
Français
Greek
Haitian Creole
Hebrew
Hindi
Hungarian
Icelandic
Indonesian
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Latvian
Lithuanian
Macedonian
Mongolian
Norwegian
Persian
Polish
Portuguese
Romanian
Russian
Serbian
Slovak
Slovenian
Spanish
Swahili
Swedish
Turkish
Ukrainian
Vietnamese
Български
中文(简体)
中文(繁體)
Periodontology 2000 1997-Oct

Is the chemical prevention of gingivitis necessary to prevent severe periodontitis?

등록 된 사용자 만 기사를 번역 할 수 있습니다.
로그인 / 가입
링크가 클립 보드에 저장됩니다.
A Sheiham

키워드

요약

Gingival inflammation seldom causes discomfort, social embarrassment or loss of function. As most sites with gingival inflammation do not progress to severe periodontal disease, gingivitis should not be considered a public health problem. Periodontitis is always preceded by gingivitis. But most gingivitis remains stable for years without progressing to periodontitis. The number of gingivitis sites that do convert is small. The levels of oral cleanliness achieved by the majority of populations in industrialized countries are below the threshold for severe destructive periodontal disease of personal and public health concern. Because methods of measuring the progression of periodontal disease are unreliable, definitive answers regarding conversion of gingivitis to severe periodontitis are lacking. Gingival inflammation frequently remains contained; most gingivitis remains stable for years without progressing to periodontitis. Decreasing gingivitis does reduce shallow pocketing, but the effect on severe periodontitis is not clear. Although the underlying justification for the reduction of plaque is to reduce gingival inflammation to prevent or reduce severe periodontitis and tooth loss, the basis for the approach is equivocal. A reasonably high level of plaque appears to be compatible with acceptably low levels of periodontal disease. Reducing nonspecific plaque levels to such levels is therefore a rational goal. The conventional methods of controlling periodontal disease involve mechanical removal of plaque and calculus. A complimentary ecological approach, using chemicals, would be to alter the environment of the pocket to prevent growth of putative pathogens. Any ecological approach should be sensitive to the dangers of disrupting the natural ecology of dental plaque. Some antimicrobial and antimetabolic agents such as fluoride, chlorhexidine and triclosan and zinc citrate can selectively suppress certain organisms or inhibit bacterial proteases implicated in tissue damage. The uncertainties about factors that convert gingival inflammation into periodontitis and periodontitis into severe periodontitis coupled with insufficient data from controlled clinical trials on the effectiveness of chemical reduction of gingivitis to prevent severe periodontitis leads one to conclude that more research is required before the need for the chemical prevention of gingivitis to prevent severe periodontitis can be justified.

페이스 북
페이지에 가입하세요

과학이 뒷받침하는 가장 완벽한 약초 데이터베이스

  • 55 개 언어로 작동
  • 과학이 뒷받침하는 약초 치료제
  • 이미지로 허브 인식
  • 인터랙티브 GPS지도-위치에 허브 태그 지정 (출시 예정)
  • 검색과 관련된 과학 출판물 읽기
  • 효과로 약초 검색
  • 관심사를 정리하고 뉴스 연구, 임상 실험 및 특허를 통해 최신 정보를 확인하세요.

증상이나 질병을 입력하고 도움이 될 수있는 약초에 대해 읽고 약초를 입력하고 사용되는 질병과 증상을 확인합니다.
* 모든 정보는 발표 된 과학 연구를 기반으로합니다.

Google Play badgeApp Store badge