Lithuanian
Albanian
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Belarusian
Bengali
Bosnian
Catalan
Czech
Danish
Deutsch
Dutch
English
Estonian
Finnish
Français
Greek
Haitian Creole
Hebrew
Hindi
Hungarian
Icelandic
Indonesian
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Latvian
Lithuanian
Macedonian
Mongolian
Norwegian
Persian
Polish
Portuguese
Romanian
Russian
Serbian
Slovak
Slovenian
Spanish
Swahili
Swedish
Turkish
Ukrainian
Vietnamese
Български
中文(简体)
中文(繁體)
Journal of Complementary and Integrative Medicine 2018-Oct

A randomized comparative study of herbal decoction of Cassia fistula Linn pod's pericarp and Myristica fragrans Houtt arils vs. mefenamic acid in spasmodic dysmenorrhoea.

Straipsnius versti gali tik registruoti vartotojai
Prisijungti Registracija
Nuoroda įrašoma į mainų sritį
Amera Anjum
Arshiya Sultana

Raktažodžiai

Santrauka

Background To compare the efficacy and safety of herbal decoction (pods of Cassia fistula Linn. and Arils of Myristica fragrans Houtt) with mefenamic acid in spasmodic dysmenorrhoea. Methods In this single-blind, prospective, parallel, standard controlled study, dysmenorrheic patients (n=64) were randomly allocated to receive herbal decoction (n=31) or mefenamic acid (n=33) for two consecutive menstrual cycles. Treatment group received 180 mL herbal decoction of post amaltas (Cassia fistula L pod's pericarp) (21 g), bisbasah (Myristica fragrans Houtt arils) (3 g) and qand siyah (jaggery) (30 g) which were orally administered at morning for 3 days before the expected start of menstruation. The control group received mefenamic acid 500 mg orally twice daily between day 1 and day 3 of menstruation. The primary outcomes were visual analog scale (VAS) for pain intensity, pain relief scale and the safety assessment by clinical examination and biochemical parameters. The secondary outcomes included health-related quality of life (HRQoL) determined by SF-12 health survey questionnaire, duration of pain and pictorial blood assessment chart score for menstrual blood loss. The data were statistically interpreted with 5% level of significance. Results At the baseline, on day 1, pain severity for VAS score between the groups [7.09 ± 1.07 vs. 6.75 ± 1.09] had no significant difference (p>0.05). However, during the second menstrual cycle, a significant reduction [0.03 + 0.17 vs. 0.42 + 1.44] in pain severity on day 1 was noted in both groups (p<0.001). During the second menstrual cycle, improvement in HRQoL health survey [SF-12 total score: 85.88 ± 5.99 vs 74.83 ± 15.9] and reduction in pain duration were significantly higher in the treatment group compared to the control group. No side effects were reported. Conclusion Herbal decoction was effective to relieve pain and to improve HRQoL in spasmodic dysmenorrhoea.

Prisijunkite prie mūsų
„Facebook“ puslapio

Išsamiausia vaistinių žolelių duomenų bazė, paremta mokslu

  • Dirba 55 kalbomis
  • Žolelių gydymas, paremtas mokslu
  • Vaistažolių atpažinimas pagal vaizdą
  • Interaktyvus GPS žemėlapis - pažymėkite vaistažoles vietoje (netrukus)
  • Skaitykite mokslines publikacijas, susijusias su jūsų paieška
  • Ieškokite vaistinių žolelių pagal jų poveikį
  • Susitvarkykite savo interesus ir sekite naujienas, klinikinius tyrimus ir patentus

Įveskite simptomą ar ligą ir perskaitykite apie žoleles, kurios gali padėti, įveskite žolę ir pamatykite ligas bei simptomus, nuo kurių ji naudojama.
* Visa informacija pagrįsta paskelbtais moksliniais tyrimais

Google Play badgeApp Store badge