Lithuanian
Albanian
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Belarusian
Bengali
Bosnian
Catalan
Czech
Danish
Deutsch
Dutch
English
Estonian
Finnish
Français
Greek
Haitian Creole
Hebrew
Hindi
Hungarian
Icelandic
Indonesian
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Latvian
Lithuanian
Macedonian
Mongolian
Norwegian
Persian
Polish
Portuguese
Romanian
Russian
Serbian
Slovak
Slovenian
Spanish
Swahili
Swedish
Turkish
Ukrainian
Vietnamese
Български
中文(简体)
中文(繁體)
Clinical lymphoma & myeloma 2007-Apr

Clinical benefits and economic analysis of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin/vincristine/dexamethasone versus doxorubicin/vincristine/dexamethasone in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma.

Straipsnius versti gali tik registruoti vartotojai
Prisijungti Registracija
Nuoroda įrašoma į mainų sritį
Christopher A Porter
Robert M Rifkin

Raktažodžiai

Santrauka

Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin has reduced toxicity compared with conventional doxorubicin. In a noninferiority trial randomizing patients to receive pegylated liposomal doxorubicin 40 mg/m(2) and vincristine 1.4 mg/m(2) (maximum, 2 mg) intravenously on day 1 plus reduced-dose dexamethasone 40 mg orally on days 1-4 (DVd; n = 97) or conventional doxorubicin 9 mg/m(2) per day and vincristine 0.4 mg per day continuous intravenous infusion on days 1-4 plus reduced-dose dexamethasone (VAd; n = 95) for >/= 4 cycles. Treatment was repeated every 4 weeks until maximal response, disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or until patients underwent transplantation. Treatment cost was estimated by applying standard US costs in 2004 to recorded health-care resource utilization units. Outcome measures included response, toxicity, and treatment cost. Objective response rates (DVd, 44%; VAd, 41%), progression-free survival (hazard ratio, 1.11; P = 0.69), and overall survival (hazard ratio, 0.88; P = 0.67) were similar between treatment groups. DVd was associated with significantly less grade 3/4 neutropenia or neutropenic fever (10% vs. 24%; P = 0.01), less sepsis, antibiotic use, growth factor support, and alopecia, but more hand-foot syndrome. Study drug costs were significantly higher for DVd versus VAd; however, lower costs for drug administration and supportive care more than offset this difference, resulting in nominally lower overall study drug treatment costs for DVd (DVd, $34,442; VAd, $35,846; P = 0.76). The DVd regimen demonstrated similar efficacy and cost with less toxicity and supportive care compared with VAd. This should improve clinical utility and optimize the opportunity for transplantation.

Prisijunkite prie mūsų
„Facebook“ puslapio

Išsamiausia vaistinių žolelių duomenų bazė, paremta mokslu

  • Dirba 55 kalbomis
  • Žolelių gydymas, paremtas mokslu
  • Vaistažolių atpažinimas pagal vaizdą
  • Interaktyvus GPS žemėlapis - pažymėkite vaistažoles vietoje (netrukus)
  • Skaitykite mokslines publikacijas, susijusias su jūsų paieška
  • Ieškokite vaistinių žolelių pagal jų poveikį
  • Susitvarkykite savo interesus ir sekite naujienas, klinikinius tyrimus ir patentus

Įveskite simptomą ar ligą ir perskaitykite apie žoleles, kurios gali padėti, įveskite žolę ir pamatykite ligas bei simptomus, nuo kurių ji naudojama.
* Visa informacija pagrįsta paskelbtais moksliniais tyrimais

Google Play badgeApp Store badge