Lithuanian
Albanian
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Belarusian
Bengali
Bosnian
Catalan
Czech
Danish
Deutsch
Dutch
English
Estonian
Finnish
Français
Greek
Haitian Creole
Hebrew
Hindi
Hungarian
Icelandic
Indonesian
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Latvian
Lithuanian
Macedonian
Mongolian
Norwegian
Persian
Polish
Portuguese
Romanian
Russian
Serbian
Slovak
Slovenian
Spanish
Swahili
Swedish
Turkish
Ukrainian
Vietnamese
Български
中文(简体)
中文(繁體)
Annals of Internal Medicine 2004-Mar

Effect of antibacterial home cleaning and handwashing products on infectious disease symptoms: a randomized, double-blind trial.

Straipsnius versti gali tik registruoti vartotojai
Prisijungti Registracija
Nuoroda įrašoma į mainų sritį
Elaine L Larson
Susan X Lin
Cabilia Gomez-Pichardo
Phyllis Della-Latta

Raktažodžiai

Santrauka

BACKGROUND

Despite the widespread household use of cleaning and personal hygiene products containing antibacterial ingredients, their effects on the incidence of infectious disease symptoms have not been studied.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effect of antibacterial cleaning and handwashing products for consumers on the occurrence of infectious disease symptoms in households.

METHODS

Randomized, double-blind clinical trial.

METHODS

Northern Manhattan inner-city neighborhood, New York.

METHODS

238 primarily Hispanic households (1178 persons) that included at least one preschool-age child.

METHODS

Households were randomly assigned to use either antibacterial or nonantibacterial products for general cleaning, laundry, and handwashing. All products were commercially available, but the packaging was blinded and the products were provided free to participants.

METHODS

Hygiene practices and infectious disease symptoms were monitored by weekly telephone calls, monthly home visits, and quarterly interviews for 48 weeks.

RESULTS

Symptoms were primarily respiratory: During 26.2% (717 of 2736) of household-months, 23.3% (640 of 2737) of household-months, and 10.2% (278 of 2737) of household-months, one or more members of the household had a runny nose, cough, or sore throat, respectively. Fever was present during 11% (301 of 2737) of household-months, vomiting was present in 2.2% (61 of 2737), diarrhea was present in 2.5% (69 of 2737), and boils or conjunctivitis were present in 0.77% (21 of 2737). Differences between intervention and control groups were not significant for any symptoms (all unadjusted and adjusted relative risks included 1.0) or for numbers of symptoms (overall incidence density ratio, 0.96 [95% CI, 0.82 to 1.12]).

CONCLUSIONS

The tested antibacterial products did not reduce the risk for symptoms of viral infectious diseases in households that included essentially healthy persons. This does not preclude the potential contribution of these products to reducing symptoms of bacterial diseases in the home.

Prisijunkite prie mūsų
„Facebook“ puslapio

Išsamiausia vaistinių žolelių duomenų bazė, paremta mokslu

  • Dirba 55 kalbomis
  • Žolelių gydymas, paremtas mokslu
  • Vaistažolių atpažinimas pagal vaizdą
  • Interaktyvus GPS žemėlapis - pažymėkite vaistažoles vietoje (netrukus)
  • Skaitykite mokslines publikacijas, susijusias su jūsų paieška
  • Ieškokite vaistinių žolelių pagal jų poveikį
  • Susitvarkykite savo interesus ir sekite naujienas, klinikinius tyrimus ir patentus

Įveskite simptomą ar ligą ir perskaitykite apie žoleles, kurios gali padėti, įveskite žolę ir pamatykite ligas bei simptomus, nuo kurių ji naudojama.
* Visa informacija pagrįsta paskelbtais moksliniais tyrimais

Google Play badgeApp Store badge