Latvian
Albanian
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Belarusian
Bengali
Bosnian
Catalan
Czech
Danish
Deutsch
Dutch
English
Estonian
Finnish
Français
Greek
Haitian Creole
Hebrew
Hindi
Hungarian
Icelandic
Indonesian
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Latvian
Lithuanian
Macedonian
Mongolian
Norwegian
Persian
Polish
Portuguese
Romanian
Russian
Serbian
Slovak
Slovenian
Spanish
Swahili
Swedish
Turkish
Ukrainian
Vietnamese
Български
中文(简体)
中文(繁體)
Zhonghua nei ke za zhi [Chinese journal of internal medicine] 1997-May

[Fluconazole versus ketoconazole in systemic fungal infection: a double-blind randomized study].

Rakstu tulkošanu var veikt tikai reģistrēti lietotāji
Ielogoties Reģistrēties
Saite tiek saglabāta starpliktuvē
H Zhang
Y Lu
D Liang

Atslēgvārdi

Abstrakts

We carried out a multiple-center study, including a double-blined randomized clinical trial on fluconazole (Flu, group A) and ketoconazole (Keto, group B) and an open trial on Flu only for evaluating the efficacy and safety of Flu in treating deep and shallow fungal infection. 222 patients participated in the study and most of them had severe underlying diseases. The dosage and therapeutic duration were as follows: Flu 200-400 mg daily for 1-8 weeks in 34 patients with fungal infection and 150 mg as a single dose in 30 patients with fungal vaginitis; Keto 400 mg daily for 1-8 weeks in 30 patients with fungal diseases and for 5 days in 30 patients with fungal vaginitis. In the trial 124 patients were randomized to receive either Flu (64 patients) or Keto (60). The cure rate in group A and B was 81.3% (52/64) and 58.0% (35/60) respectively (P < 0.05). The fungal eradication rates of the two groups were 85.7% and 70.0% (P > 0.05) respectively. 98 patients entered the open trial. They included fungal infection of the respiratory tract and urinary tract, cryptococal meningitis, fungal sepesis and systemic dissemination of mycosis and fungal vaginitis. 84 (85.7%) were cured. The fungal eradication rate of this group was 92.9%. The side-effect rates of the three groups were 3.1% (2/64), 5.0% (3/60) and 6.1% (6/98) respectively. They were mild and transient vomiting, nausea, and anorexia. In group B and the open group however, there was one case of ALT elevation in each group (P > 0.05). This study suggests that Flu is a safe, effective and useful drug for the treatment of severe fungal infection.

Pievienojieties mūsu
facebook lapai

Vispilnīgākā ārstniecības augu datu bāze, kuru atbalsta zinātne

  • Darbojas 55 valodās
  • Zāļu ārstniecības līdzekļi, kurus atbalsta zinātne
  • Garšaugu atpazīšana pēc attēla
  • Interaktīva GPS karte - atzīmējiet garšaugus atrašanās vietā (drīzumā)
  • Lasiet zinātniskās publikācijas, kas saistītas ar jūsu meklēšanu
  • Meklēt ārstniecības augus pēc to iedarbības
  • Organizējiet savas intereses un sekojiet līdzi jaunumiem, klīniskajiem izmēģinājumiem un patentiem

Ierakstiet simptomu vai slimību un izlasiet par garšaugiem, kas varētu palīdzēt, ierakstiet zāli un redziet slimības un simptomus, pret kuriem tā tiek lietota.
* Visa informācija ir balstīta uz publicētiem zinātniskiem pētījumiem

Google Play badgeApp Store badge