Latvian
Albanian
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Belarusian
Bengali
Bosnian
Catalan
Czech
Danish
Deutsch
Dutch
English
Estonian
Finnish
Français
Greek
Haitian Creole
Hebrew
Hindi
Hungarian
Icelandic
Indonesian
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Latvian
Lithuanian
Macedonian
Mongolian
Norwegian
Persian
Polish
Portuguese
Romanian
Russian
Serbian
Slovak
Slovenian
Spanish
Swahili
Swedish
Turkish
Ukrainian
Vietnamese
Български
中文(简体)
中文(繁體)
West African journal of medicine

Glycaemic response to some commonly eaten fruits in type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Rakstu tulkošanu var veikt tikai reģistrēti lietotāji
Ielogoties Reģistrēties
Saite tiek saglabāta starpliktuvē
A E Edo
A Eregie
O S Adediran
A E Ohwovoriole

Atslēgvārdi

Abstrakts

BACKGROUND

It is not known which of the commonly consumed fruits in Nigeria are suitable for persons with diabetes mellitus especially with regards to the attendant plasma glucose response (PGR) to consumption of such fruits.

OBJECTIVE

To determine and compare the PGR to commonly eaten fruits in patients with diabetes mellitus.

METHODS

Ten persons with type 2 diabetes mellitus were studied. Fifty-gram portions of five fruits containing 50 g carbohydrate [ banana, Musa paradisiaca; orange, Citrus sinensis; pineapple, Ananus comosus; mango, Magnifera indica; pawpaw, Carica papaya], and glucose were randomly fed to the study subjects at one-week intervals. Blood samples were collected in the fasting state and half-hourly over a 2- hour period post-ingestion of the fruits or glucose for plasma glucose determination. Plasma glucose responses were assessed by the peak plasma glucose concentration (PPPG), maximum increase in postprandial plasma glucose (MIPG), two-hour postprandial plasma glucose level (2hPG) and incremental area under the glucose curve (IAUGC).

RESULTS

The mean ± SEM PPPG in mmol/L were: banana, 9.0± 1.6; orange, 8.1± 0.8; pineapple, 9.2±1.1; mango, 8.0 ± 1.1; and pawpaw, 7.8±0.9. The mean ±SEM IAUGC in mmol.min/L were: banana, 131.7±53.4; orange, 108.7±29.8; pineapple, 115.3±33.2; mango, 101.6 ± 28.7; and pawpaw, 124.1± 46.1. However, mango showed the least MIPG (1.8 ± 0.5 mmol/l) followed by orange and pawpaw. The IAUGC also followed this pattern. There were no significant differences among the glycaemic indices of the fruits. Glucose load produced a significantly higher IAUGC than the fruits (orange, pineapple, mango, pawpaw, p<0.005; banana, p<0.025).

CONCLUSIONS

The plasma glucose response to consumption of Nigeria fruits are similar. The PGR indices to all fruits were less than the PGR after an equivalent carbohydrate load of glucose. It appears safe to recommend these Nigerian fruits to persons with diabetes within the prescribed daily total calorie intake.

Pievienojieties mūsu
facebook lapai

Vispilnīgākā ārstniecības augu datu bāze, kuru atbalsta zinātne

  • Darbojas 55 valodās
  • Zāļu ārstniecības līdzekļi, kurus atbalsta zinātne
  • Garšaugu atpazīšana pēc attēla
  • Interaktīva GPS karte - atzīmējiet garšaugus atrašanās vietā (drīzumā)
  • Lasiet zinātniskās publikācijas, kas saistītas ar jūsu meklēšanu
  • Meklēt ārstniecības augus pēc to iedarbības
  • Organizējiet savas intereses un sekojiet līdzi jaunumiem, klīniskajiem izmēģinājumiem un patentiem

Ierakstiet simptomu vai slimību un izlasiet par garšaugiem, kas varētu palīdzēt, ierakstiet zāli un redziet slimības un simptomus, pret kuriem tā tiek lietota.
* Visa informācija ir balstīta uz publicētiem zinātniskiem pētījumiem

Google Play badgeApp Store badge