Latvian
Albanian
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Belarusian
Bengali
Bosnian
Catalan
Czech
Danish
Deutsch
Dutch
English
Estonian
Finnish
Français
Greek
Haitian Creole
Hebrew
Hindi
Hungarian
Icelandic
Indonesian
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Latvian
Lithuanian
Macedonian
Mongolian
Norwegian
Persian
Polish
Portuguese
Romanian
Russian
Serbian
Slovak
Slovenian
Spanish
Swahili
Swedish
Turkish
Ukrainian
Vietnamese
Български
中文(简体)
中文(繁體)
Zhongguo Zhongyao Zazhi 2017-Mar

[Meta-analysis on indirect comparison of Erigeron breviscapus injection and Breviscapus injection in treatment of acute ischemic stroke].

Rakstu tulkošanu var veikt tikai reģistrēti lietotāji
Ielogoties Reģistrēties
Saite tiek saglabāta starpliktuvē
Yu-Fang Zhang
Xi-Tong Ke
Bao-Cai Li
Cheng Xiang
Song Zhao

Atslēgvārdi

Abstrakts

Erigeron breviscapus injection(DZXI) and Breviscapus injection(DZSI) are two popular injections in treatment of acute ischemic stroke in China. Both of them are manufactured from a same herbal medicine, E. breviscapus, but DZXI is an herbal extract(mixture) preparation and DZSI is a pure compound injection. This article was aimed to systemically evaluate and compare their efficacy and safety in treatment of acute ischemic stroke. The randomized controlled trials(RCTs) were collected for comparing DZXI and DZSI with Salvia miltiorrhiza injection(FDI) as the medium, and they were compared with indirect Meta-analysis(ITC). Thirty-nine RCTs with 4 180 patients were included. Meta-analysis results showed that both DZXI and DZSI had better efficacy than FDI in acute ischemic stroke. In the indirect comparison, DZSI had a higher total efficacy than DZXI, with significantly statistical differences[OR=0.634, 95%CI = (0.432,0.928), P<0.000 01], but there was no significant difference in improvement of neurological deficit [MD=-1.19, 95%CI=(-3.57,1.19), P=0.953]. On the safety aspect, adverse reaction rate of DZXI was 1.14%, mainly including head swelling, fever and chills while DZSI had no significant adverse reactions. The limited evidences in this study showed that Breviscapine injection had higher total efficiency and safety than E. breviscapine injection, but due to the low quality of the included RCTs, these two medicines should be comprehensively compared in further high-quality clinical trials.

Pievienojieties mūsu
facebook lapai

Vispilnīgākā ārstniecības augu datu bāze, kuru atbalsta zinātne

  • Darbojas 55 valodās
  • Zāļu ārstniecības līdzekļi, kurus atbalsta zinātne
  • Garšaugu atpazīšana pēc attēla
  • Interaktīva GPS karte - atzīmējiet garšaugus atrašanās vietā (drīzumā)
  • Lasiet zinātniskās publikācijas, kas saistītas ar jūsu meklēšanu
  • Meklēt ārstniecības augus pēc to iedarbības
  • Organizējiet savas intereses un sekojiet līdzi jaunumiem, klīniskajiem izmēģinājumiem un patentiem

Ierakstiet simptomu vai slimību un izlasiet par garšaugiem, kas varētu palīdzēt, ierakstiet zāli un redziet slimības un simptomus, pret kuriem tā tiek lietota.
* Visa informācija ir balstīta uz publicētiem zinātniskiem pētījumiem

Google Play badgeApp Store badge