Latvian
Albanian
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Belarusian
Bengali
Bosnian
Catalan
Czech
Danish
Deutsch
Dutch
English
Estonian
Finnish
Français
Greek
Haitian Creole
Hebrew
Hindi
Hungarian
Icelandic
Indonesian
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Latvian
Lithuanian
Macedonian
Mongolian
Norwegian
Persian
Polish
Portuguese
Romanian
Russian
Serbian
Slovak
Slovenian
Spanish
Swahili
Swedish
Turkish
Ukrainian
Vietnamese
Български
中文(简体)
中文(繁體)
Clinical Therapeutics

Multicenter comparative trial of ciprofloxacin versus cefuroxime axetil in the treatment of acute rhinosinusitis in a primary care setting. Rhinosinusitis Investigation Group.

Rakstu tulkošanu var veikt tikai reģistrēti lietotāji
Ielogoties Reģistrēties
Saite tiek saglabāta starpliktuvē
M Weis
K Hendrick
G Tillotson
K Gravelle

Atslēgvārdi

Abstrakts

In a primary care setting, the efficacy and safety of ciprofloxacin (CIP) 500 mg b.i.d. were compared with those of cefuroxime axetil (CA) 250 mg b.i.d., each given for 10 days, in a nationwide, open, prospective, randomized trial of 1414 adults with acute sinusitis. Patients were enrolled if they had clinically documented acute sinusitis (ie, rhinosinusitis) (<4 weeks' duration), based on the 1997 American Academy of Otorhinolaryngology--Head and Neck Surgery criteria of either two major or one major and two minor symptoms. The primary efficacy variable was clinical response (resolution or failure) at the posttherapy assessment on study days 14 through 26. The most common presenting major signs and symptoms of acute rhinosinusitis were facial congestion, nasal drainage/purulence, facial pain/pressure, and nasal obstruction/blockage. The minor symptom, headache, was more common and severe than was nasal obstruction/blockage. A total of 1219 patients were clinically evaluable. Clinical resolution was observed in 559 of 613 (91.2%) CIP-treated patients and 546 of 606 (90. 1%) CA-treated patients. The two regimens were statistically equivalent (95% confidence interval, -2.16% to 4.71%). There were 80 drug-related adverse events reported in the CIP-treated patients and 81 drug-related adverse events reported in the CA-treated patients. The main adverse events were nausea (n = 18) and diarrhea (n = 7) in patients treated with CIP and diarrhea (n = 14), nausea (n = 12), headache (n = 7), and vaginitis (n = 7) in those treated with CA. CIP 500 mg b.i.d. was found to be statistically equivalent to CA 250 mg b.i.d. in the treatment of acute rhinosinusitis.

Pievienojieties mūsu
facebook lapai

Vispilnīgākā ārstniecības augu datu bāze, kuru atbalsta zinātne

  • Darbojas 55 valodās
  • Zāļu ārstniecības līdzekļi, kurus atbalsta zinātne
  • Garšaugu atpazīšana pēc attēla
  • Interaktīva GPS karte - atzīmējiet garšaugus atrašanās vietā (drīzumā)
  • Lasiet zinātniskās publikācijas, kas saistītas ar jūsu meklēšanu
  • Meklēt ārstniecības augus pēc to iedarbības
  • Organizējiet savas intereses un sekojiet līdzi jaunumiem, klīniskajiem izmēģinājumiem un patentiem

Ierakstiet simptomu vai slimību un izlasiet par garšaugiem, kas varētu palīdzēt, ierakstiet zāli un redziet slimības un simptomus, pret kuriem tā tiek lietota.
* Visa informācija ir balstīta uz publicētiem zinātniskiem pētījumiem

Google Play badgeApp Store badge