Mongolian
Albanian
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Belarusian
Bengali
Bosnian
Catalan
Czech
Danish
Deutsch
Dutch
English
Estonian
Finnish
Français
Greek
Haitian Creole
Hebrew
Hindi
Hungarian
Icelandic
Indonesian
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Latvian
Lithuanian
Macedonian
Mongolian
Norwegian
Persian
Polish
Portuguese
Romanian
Russian
Serbian
Slovak
Slovenian
Spanish
Swahili
Swedish
Turkish
Ukrainian
Vietnamese
Български
中文(简体)
中文(繁體)
Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety 2011-Apr

Antidiabetic treatments and risk of hospitalisation with myocardial infarction: a nationwide case-control study.

Зөвхөн бүртгэлтэй хэрэглэгчид л нийтлэл орчуулах боломжтой
Нэвтрэх / Бүртгүүлэх
Холбоосыг санах ойд хадгалдаг
Henriette Thisted Horsdal
Flemming Søndergaard
Søren Paaske Johnsen
Jørgen Rungby

Түлхүүр үгс

Хураангуй

OBJECTIVE

Data on cardiovascular risk associated with different types of antidiabetic treatments are sparse and conflicting. We examined the risk of hospitalisation with myocardial infarction (MI) among patients treated with sulfonylureas, metformin, insulin, any combination and no antidiabetic pharmacotherapy.

METHODS

Using nationwide registries, we conducted a population-based nested case-control study among all patients with type 2 diabetes in Denmark and identified all patients hospitalised with a first-time MI and age- and gender-matched non-MI controls in the period 1996-2004. We estimated odds ratios (ORs) of MI according to type of antidiabetic treatment, adjusted for potential confounding factors using patients treated with sulfonylureas as the reference group.

RESULTS

A total of 10,616 type 2 diabetic cases hospitalised with MI and 90,697 type 2 diabetic non-MI controls were available for analysis. We found a lower risk of hospitalisation with MI among users of metformin (adjusted OR = 0.86, 95%CI: 0.78-0.95), insulin (adjusted OR = 0.92, 95%CI: 0.86-0.99) and among patients not receiving any antidiabetic pharmacotherapy (adjusted OR = 0.75, 95%CI: 0.71-0.79) compared with users of sulfonylureas. Users of any combination had similar risk as users of sulfonylureas (adjusted OR = 0.99, 95%CI: 0.92-1.06). We found no differences between individual sulfonylureas, and glycaemic control and lipid profile had only minor impact on the risk estimates in subanalyses including HbA(1c) , cholesterol and triglycerides.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings provide some support for the hypothesis that sulfonylureas may be associated with an increased risk of hospitalisation with MI.

Манай facebook
хуудсанд нэгдээрэй

Шинжлэх ухаанаар баталгаажсан эмийн өвс ургамлын бүрэн мэдээллийн сан

  • 55 хэл дээр ажилладаг
  • Шинжлэх ухааны үндэслэсэн ургамлын гаралтай эдгэрэлт
  • Ургамлыг дүрсээр таних
  • Интерактив GPS газрын зураг - эмийн ургамлыг байршлаар нь тэмдэглэнэ (удахгүй)
  • Хайлттай холбоотой шинжлэх ухааны нийтлэлүүдийг уншина уу
  • Эмийн өвсийг үр нөлөөгөөр нь хайж олох
  • Мэдээллийн судалгаа, клиник туршилт, патентыг цаг тухайд нь сонирхож, зохион байгуул

Шинж тэмдэг эсвэл өвчний талаар бичиж, тус болох ургамлын талаар уншиж, өвслөг ургамлыг бичиж, өвчний эсрэг шинж тэмдгийг үзээрэй.
* Бүх мэдээлэл нь хэвлэгдсэн эрдэм шинжилгээний судалгаанд үндэслэсэн болно

Google Play badgeApp Store badge