Mongolian
Albanian
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Belarusian
Bengali
Bosnian
Catalan
Czech
Danish
Deutsch
Dutch
English
Estonian
Finnish
Français
Greek
Haitian Creole
Hebrew
Hindi
Hungarian
Icelandic
Indonesian
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Latvian
Lithuanian
Macedonian
Mongolian
Norwegian
Persian
Polish
Portuguese
Romanian
Russian
Serbian
Slovak
Slovenian
Spanish
Swahili
Swedish
Turkish
Ukrainian
Vietnamese
Български
中文(简体)
中文(繁體)
Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions 2011-Apr

Paclitaxel-eluting stents compared with bare metal stents in diabetic patients with acute myocardial infarction: the Harmonizing Outcomes with Revascularization and Stents in Acute Myocardial Infarction (HORIZONS-AMI) trial.

Зөвхөн бүртгэлтэй хэрэглэгчид л нийтлэл орчуулах боломжтой
Нэвтрэх / Бүртгүүлэх
Холбоосыг санах ойд хадгалдаг
Bernhard Witzenbichler
Jochen Wöhrle
Giulio Guagliumi
Jan Z Peruga
Bruce R Brodie
Dariusz Dudek
Ran Kornowski
Franz Hartmann
Kristin L Hood
Helen Parise

Түлхүүр үгс

Хураангуй

BACKGROUND

In the prospective, randomized Harmonizing Outcomes with Revascularization and Stents in Acute Myocardial Infarction (HORIZONS-AMI) trial, implantation of paclitaxel-eluting stents (PES) safely reduced the rates of ischemic target lesion revascularization (TLR) compared with bare metal stents (BMS) in patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing primary percutaneous intervention. Diabetes mellitus is a known predictor of adverse outcomes after percutaneous intervention in STEMI. We therefore sought to assess the impact of PES in diabetic patients with STEMI from the HORIZONS-AMI trial.

RESULTS

A total of 478 patients with diabetes and 2527 without diabetes were randomly assigned to receive PES versus BMS. The 12-month rates of ischemic TLR were significantly reduced by PES compared with BMS in both diabetic (11.2% versus 5.2%; hazard ratio [95% confidence interval]=0.45 [0.21 to 0.93]; P=0.03) and nondiabetic (6.8% versus 4.3%, hazard ratio [95% confidence interval]=0.63 [0.44 to 0.92]; P=0.02) patients. In patients with insulin-treated diabetes, PES compared with BMS reduced the 12-month TLR rate from 21.4% to 7.3% (hazard ratio [95% confidence interval]=0.35 [0.12 to 1.03]; P=0.046). Angiographic late loss and binary restenosis at 13 months were also significantly reduced in PES-treated diabetic patients. There were no significant differences between the BMS and PES groups in the 12-month rates of death, reinfarction, stroke, or stent thrombosis in either diabetic or nondiabetic patients.

CONCLUSIONS

In the large-scale, prospective, randomized HORIZONS-AMI trial, implantation of PES compared with BMS in patients with STEMI and diabetes mellitus resulted in significant reductions in ischemia-driven TLR and angiographic restenosis at 1 year, with comparable safety outcomes, including stent thrombosis. These results suggest that PES can safely be used to reduce restenosis in high-risk diabetic patients presenting with STEMI.

BACKGROUND

URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00433966.

Манай facebook
хуудсанд нэгдээрэй

Шинжлэх ухаанаар баталгаажсан эмийн өвс ургамлын бүрэн мэдээллийн сан

  • 55 хэл дээр ажилладаг
  • Шинжлэх ухааны үндэслэсэн ургамлын гаралтай эдгэрэлт
  • Ургамлыг дүрсээр таних
  • Интерактив GPS газрын зураг - эмийн ургамлыг байршлаар нь тэмдэглэнэ (удахгүй)
  • Хайлттай холбоотой шинжлэх ухааны нийтлэлүүдийг уншина уу
  • Эмийн өвсийг үр нөлөөгөөр нь хайж олох
  • Мэдээллийн судалгаа, клиник туршилт, патентыг цаг тухайд нь сонирхож, зохион байгуул

Шинж тэмдэг эсвэл өвчний талаар бичиж, тус болох ургамлын талаар уншиж, өвслөг ургамлыг бичиж, өвчний эсрэг шинж тэмдгийг үзээрэй.
* Бүх мэдээлэл нь хэвлэгдсэн эрдэм шинжилгээний судалгаанд үндэслэсэн болно

Google Play badgeApp Store badge