Mongolian
Albanian
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Belarusian
Bengali
Bosnian
Catalan
Czech
Danish
Deutsch
Dutch
English
Estonian
Finnish
Français
Greek
Haitian Creole
Hebrew
Hindi
Hungarian
Icelandic
Indonesian
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Latvian
Lithuanian
Macedonian
Mongolian
Norwegian
Persian
Polish
Portuguese
Romanian
Russian
Serbian
Slovak
Slovenian
Spanish
Swahili
Swedish
Turkish
Ukrainian
Vietnamese
Български
中文(简体)
中文(繁體)
American Journal of Cardiology 2006-Jul

Sirolimus-eluting stents versus Paclitaxel-eluting stents in the treatment of coronary artery disease in patients with diabetes mellitus.

Зөвхөн бүртгэлтэй хэрэглэгчид л нийтлэл орчуулах боломжтой
Нэвтрэх / Бүртгүүлэх
Холбоосыг санах ойд хадгалдаг
Pramod K Kuchulakanti
William W Chu
Rebecca Torguson
Leonardo Clavijo
Roswitha Wolfram
Sundeep Mishra
Zhenyi Xue
Natalie Gevorkian
William O Suddath
Lowell F Satler

Түлхүүр үгс

Хураангуй

This study was performed to compare the safety and efficacy of sirolimus-eluting stents (SESs) and paclitaxel-eluting stents (PESs) on the outcomes of diabetic patients. Recent data with drug-eluting stents have shown improved clinical outcomes in diabetic patients. This study compared outcomes between the 2 available drug-eluting stents, SESs and PESs. From the prospective drug-eluting stent registries at the investigators' institution, 1,320 consecutive diabetic patients treated with SESs (n=873, 1,293 lesions) and PESs (n=447, 733 lesions) were identified and their in-hospital and 1- and 6-month clinical outcomes compared. Baseline characteristics showed more men, more patients with previous coronary bypass surgery, and smaller ejection fractions in the PES group and more obese patients in the SES group. Procedural characteristics were similar except for more left anterior descending artery and proximal lesions and the greater use of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors in the SES group and more type C lesions, direct stenting, and stents per patient in the PES group. In-hospital complications were similar. Clinical follow-up at 1 month was also similar between the 2 groups, including subacute stent thrombosis. At 6 months, the 2 groups had similar mortality (7% vs 7%), myocardial infarctions (18% vs 21%), target lesion revascularization, target vessel revascularization, major adverse cardiac events (11% vs 12%), and late thrombosis (0.3% vs 0%). Subanalysis of insulin-treated diabetic patients showed no significant differences in outcomes in the 2 groups. No significant differences were found between SESs and PESs on Cox regression analysis for hazard ratios. In conclusion, SESs and PESs are associated with similar efficacy and safety with regard to repeat revascularization rates, major adverse cardiac events, and stent thrombosis up to 6 months for the treatment of coronary artery disease in patients with diabetes mellitus regardless of insulin therapy.

Манай facebook
хуудсанд нэгдээрэй

Шинжлэх ухаанаар баталгаажсан эмийн өвс ургамлын бүрэн мэдээллийн сан

  • 55 хэл дээр ажилладаг
  • Шинжлэх ухааны үндэслэсэн ургамлын гаралтай эдгэрэлт
  • Ургамлыг дүрсээр таних
  • Интерактив GPS газрын зураг - эмийн ургамлыг байршлаар нь тэмдэглэнэ (удахгүй)
  • Хайлттай холбоотой шинжлэх ухааны нийтлэлүүдийг уншина уу
  • Эмийн өвсийг үр нөлөөгөөр нь хайж олох
  • Мэдээллийн судалгаа, клиник туршилт, патентыг цаг тухайд нь сонирхож, зохион байгуул

Шинж тэмдэг эсвэл өвчний талаар бичиж, тус болох ургамлын талаар уншиж, өвслөг ургамлыг бичиж, өвчний эсрэг шинж тэмдгийг үзээрэй.
* Бүх мэдээлэл нь хэвлэгдсэн эрдэм шинжилгээний судалгаанд үндэслэсэн болно

Google Play badgeApp Store badge