Dutch
Albanian
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Belarusian
Bengali
Bosnian
Catalan
Czech
Danish
Deutsch
Dutch
English
Estonian
Finnish
Français
Greek
Haitian Creole
Hebrew
Hindi
Hungarian
Icelandic
Indonesian
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Latvian
Lithuanian
Macedonian
Mongolian
Norwegian
Persian
Polish
Portuguese
Romanian
Russian
Serbian
Slovak
Slovenian
Spanish
Swahili
Swedish
Turkish
Ukrainian
Vietnamese
Български
中文(简体)
中文(繁體)
Puerto Rico Health Sciences Journal 1999-Dec

An evaluation of modified case definitions for the detection of dengue hemorrhagic fever. Puerto Rico Association of Epidemiologists.

Alleen geregistreerde gebruikers kunnen artikelen vertalen
Log in Schrijf in
De link wordt op het klembord opgeslagen
J G Rigau-Pérez
G L Bonilla

Sleutelwoorden

Abstract

The case definition for dengue hemorrhagic fever (DHF) requires fever, platelets < or = 100,000/mm3, any hemorrhagic manifestation, and plasma leakage evidenced by hemoconcentration > or = 20%, pleural or abdominal effusions, hypoproteinemia or hypoalbuminemia. We evaluated the specificity and yield of modified DHF case definitions and the recently proposed World Health Organization criteria for a provisional diagnosis of DHF, using a data base of laboratory-positive and laboratory-negative reports of hospitalizations for suspected dengue in Puerto Rico, 1994 to 1996. By design, all modifications had 100% sensitivity. More liberal criteria for plasma leakage were examined: 1) adding as evidence a single hematocrit > or = 50% (specificity 97.4%); 2) accepting hemoconcentration > or = 10% (specificity 90.1%); and 3) accepting either hematocrit > or = 50% or hemoconcentration > or = 10% (specificity 88.8%). The new DHF cases identified by these definitions (and percent laboratory positive) were 25 (100.0%), 95 (90.5%), and 107 (91.6%), respectively. In contrast, the provisional diagnosis of DHF (fever and hemorrhage, and one or more of platelets < or = 100,000/mm3, or hemoconcentration > or = 20%, or at least a rising hematocrit [redefined quantitatively as a 5% or greater relative change]) showed a specificity of 66.8%, and identified 318 new DHF cases, of which 282 (88.7%) were laboratory-positive. Very small changes in the criteria may result in a large number of new cases. The modification that accepted either hematocrit > or = 50% or hemoconcentration > or = 10% had acceptable specificity, while doubling the detection of DHF-compatible, laboratory-positive severe cases, but "provisional diagnosis" showed even lower specificity, and may produce inflated DHF incidence figures. Modified case definitions should be prospectively evaluated with patients in a health-care facility before they are recommended for widespread use.

Word lid van onze
facebookpagina

De meest complete database met geneeskrachtige kruiden, ondersteund door de wetenschap

  • Werkt in 55 talen
  • Kruidengeneesmiddelen gesteund door de wetenschap
  • Kruidenherkenning door beeld
  • Interactieve GPS-kaart - tag kruiden op locatie (binnenkort beschikbaar)
  • Lees wetenschappelijke publicaties met betrekking tot uw zoekopdracht
  • Zoek medicinale kruiden op hun effecten
  • Organiseer uw interesses en blijf op de hoogte van nieuwsonderzoek, klinische onderzoeken en patenten

Typ een symptoom of een ziekte en lees over kruiden die kunnen helpen, typ een kruid en zie ziekten en symptomen waartegen het wordt gebruikt.
* Alle informatie is gebaseerd op gepubliceerd wetenschappelijk onderzoek

Google Play badgeApp Store badge