Clinical analysis of gastroesophageal reflux after PEG.

BACKGROUND

It is difficult to predict whether or not gastroesophageal reflux (GER), such as aspiration or vomiting, will occur after PEG.

OBJECTIVE

To identify factors that would support the prediction of aspiration after PEG.

METHODS

Case-control study.

METHODS

Patients who underwent PEG from February 1998 to June 2005 in our hospital.

METHODS

The study included 178 patients.

METHODS

Endoscopic observation was carried out during PEG tube placement and at PEG tube replacement to determine the presence of hiatus hernia and/or reflux esophagitis.

METHODS

Gastric emptying and GER index (GERI) were measured by using a radioisotope technique.

RESULTS

The patients were divided into 2 groups: the non-GER (NGER) group (n = 108), who had no symptoms of GER, and the GER group (n = 70), who showed these symptoms. No significant differences were observed between the groups in age, sex, morbidity, the presence of reflux esophagitis at PEG tube placement, gastric emptying, or serum albumin levels. The presence of a hiatus hernia (P = .028) and reflux esophagitis grading Los Angeles classification C or D (P = .008) were significantly more frequent in the GER group compared with the NGER group. The GERI was also significantly higher in the GER group than in the NGER group (P < .0001).

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of hiatus hernia, severe reflux esophagitis, and a high GERI might be predictive factors of aspiration or vomiting after PEG tube placement.