Dutch
Albanian
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Belarusian
Bengali
Bosnian
Catalan
Czech
Danish
Deutsch
Dutch
English
Estonian
Finnish
Français
Greek
Haitian Creole
Hebrew
Hindi
Hungarian
Icelandic
Indonesian
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Latvian
Lithuanian
Macedonian
Mongolian
Norwegian
Persian
Polish
Portuguese
Romanian
Russian
Serbian
Slovak
Slovenian
Spanish
Swahili
Swedish
Turkish
Ukrainian
Vietnamese
Български
中文(简体)
中文(繁體)
Chest 2016-Sep

Computer-Aided Quantitative Ultrasonography for Detection of Pulmonary Edema in Mechanically Ventilated Cardiac Surgery Patients.

Alleen geregistreerde gebruikers kunnen artikelen vertalen
Log in Schrijf in
De link wordt op het klembord opgeslagen
Francesco Corradi
Claudia Brusasco
Antonella Vezzani
Gregorio Santori
Tullio Manca
Lorenzo Ball
Francesco Nicolini
Tiziano Gherli
Vito Brusasco

Sleutelwoorden

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Lung ultrasonography (LUS) has been used for noninvasive detection of pulmonary edema. Semiquantitative LUS visual scores (visual LUS [V-LUS]) based on B lines are moderately correlated with pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) and extravascular lung water (EVLW). A new computer-aided quantitative LUS (Q-LUS) analysis has been recently proposed. This study investigated whether Q-LUS better correlates with PCWP and EVLW than V-LUS and to what extent positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) affects the assessment of pulmonary edema by Q-LUS or V-LUS.

METHODS

Forty-eight mechanically ventilated patients with PEEP of 5 or 10 cm H2O and monitored by PCWP (n = 28) or EVLW (n = 20) were studied.

RESULTS

PCWP was significantly and strongly correlated with Q-LUS gray (Gy) unit value (r(2) = 0.70) but weakly correlated with V-LUS B-line score (r(2) = 0.20). EVLW was significantly and more strongly correlated with Q-LUS Gy unit mean value (r(2) = 0.68) than with V-LUS B-line score (r(2) = 0.34). Q-LUS showed a better diagnostic accuracy than V-LUS for the detection of PCWP >18 mm Hg or EVLW ≥ 10 mL/kg. With 5-cm H2O PEEP, the correlations with PCWP or EVLW were stronger for Q-LUS than V-LUS. With 10-cm H2O PEEP, the correlations with PCWP or EVLW were still significant for Q-LUS but insignificant for V-LUS. Interobserver reproducibility was better for Q-LUS than V-LUS.

CONCLUSIONS

Both V-LUS and Q-LUS are acceptable indicators of pulmonary edema in mechanically ventilated patients. However, at high PEEP only Q-LUS provides data that are significantly correlated with PCWP and EVLW. Computer-aided Q-LUS has the advantages of being not only independent of operator perception but also of PEEP.

Word lid van onze
facebookpagina

De meest complete database met geneeskrachtige kruiden, ondersteund door de wetenschap

  • Werkt in 55 talen
  • Kruidengeneesmiddelen gesteund door de wetenschap
  • Kruidenherkenning door beeld
  • Interactieve GPS-kaart - tag kruiden op locatie (binnenkort beschikbaar)
  • Lees wetenschappelijke publicaties met betrekking tot uw zoekopdracht
  • Zoek medicinale kruiden op hun effecten
  • Organiseer uw interesses en blijf op de hoogte van nieuwsonderzoek, klinische onderzoeken en patenten

Typ een symptoom of een ziekte en lees over kruiden die kunnen helpen, typ een kruid en zie ziekten en symptomen waartegen het wordt gebruikt.
* Alle informatie is gebaseerd op gepubliceerd wetenschappelijk onderzoek

Google Play badgeApp Store badge