Dutch
Albanian
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Belarusian
Bengali
Bosnian
Catalan
Czech
Danish
Deutsch
Dutch
English
Estonian
Finnish
Français
Greek
Haitian Creole
Hebrew
Hindi
Hungarian
Icelandic
Indonesian
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Latvian
Lithuanian
Macedonian
Mongolian
Norwegian
Persian
Polish
Portuguese
Romanian
Russian
Serbian
Slovak
Slovenian
Spanish
Swahili
Swedish
Turkish
Ukrainian
Vietnamese
Български
中文(简体)
中文(繁體)
Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research 1995-Apr

Divergence of ethanol and acetaldehyde kinetics and of the disulfiram-alcohol reaction between subjects with and without alcoholic liver disease.

Alleen geregistreerde gebruikers kunnen artikelen vertalen
Log in Schrijf in
De link wordt op het klembord opgeslagen
F Wicht
H U Fisch
J Nelles
J Raisin
P Allemann
R Preisig

Sleutelwoorden

Abstract

Despite standardization, marked interindividual variation in the severity of the disulfiram-alcohol reaction (DAR) has been observed. We studied the DAR in 51 consecutive alcoholics with (n = 16) and without (n = 35) significant alcoholic liver disease. Clinical signs of the DAR were much weaker in the patients with compared with those patients without liver disease. Because acetaldehyde is thought to be the main cause of the DAR, we studied ethanol and acetaldehyde kinetics in 13 patients (6 females, 7 males) with alcoholic liver disease (documented by biopsy, clinical and/or radiological findings, and by quantitative liver function) [galactose elimination capacity (GEC) 4.2 +/- SD 1.0 mg/min/kg; aminopyrine breath test (ABT) 0.14 +/- 0.10% dose x kg/mmol CO2] and 13 age- and sex-matched controls (alcoholics without significant liver disease, GEC 7.1 +/- 0.7; ABT 0.81 +/- 0.35). Clinical signs of acetaldehyde toxicity during the DAR (flush, nausea, tachycardia, and blood pressure drop) were absent in alcoholic liver disease, but clearly evident in controls. Blood ethanol kinetics were similar in both groups, Cmax and area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) being 6.27 +/- 1.82 and 368.9 +/- 72.9 mmol x min/liter in alcoholic liver disease, and 6.62 +/- 1.71 and 377.6 +/- 124.5 in controls, respectively. In contrast, there was a strong (p < 0.001) difference in Cmax and AUC of acetaldehyde, respective values being 33.46 +/- 21.52 and 1463.8 +/- 762.5 mumol x min/liter in alcoholic liver disease, and 110.87 +/- 56.00 and 4162.0 +/- 2424.6 in controls.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Word lid van onze
facebookpagina

De meest complete database met geneeskrachtige kruiden, ondersteund door de wetenschap

  • Werkt in 55 talen
  • Kruidengeneesmiddelen gesteund door de wetenschap
  • Kruidenherkenning door beeld
  • Interactieve GPS-kaart - tag kruiden op locatie (binnenkort beschikbaar)
  • Lees wetenschappelijke publicaties met betrekking tot uw zoekopdracht
  • Zoek medicinale kruiden op hun effecten
  • Organiseer uw interesses en blijf op de hoogte van nieuwsonderzoek, klinische onderzoeken en patenten

Typ een symptoom of een ziekte en lees over kruiden die kunnen helpen, typ een kruid en zie ziekten en symptomen waartegen het wordt gebruikt.
* Alle informatie is gebaseerd op gepubliceerd wetenschappelijk onderzoek

Google Play badgeApp Store badge