Dutch
Albanian
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Belarusian
Bengali
Bosnian
Catalan
Czech
Danish
Deutsch
Dutch
English
Estonian
Finnish
Français
Greek
Haitian Creole
Hebrew
Hindi
Hungarian
Icelandic
Indonesian
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Latvian
Lithuanian
Macedonian
Mongolian
Norwegian
Persian
Polish
Portuguese
Romanian
Russian
Serbian
Slovak
Slovenian
Spanish
Swahili
Swedish
Turkish
Ukrainian
Vietnamese
Български
中文(简体)
中文(繁體)
Zhongguo zhong xi yi jie he za zhi Zhongguo Zhongxiyi jiehe zazhi = Chinese journal of integrated traditional and Western medicine / Zhongguo Zhong xi yi jie he xue hui, Zhongguo Zhong yi yan jiu yuan zhu ban 2000-Apr

[Mucosal injury of gastric corpus by hemorrhage reperfusion and comparison between preventing and therapeutic effect of Salvia extract F and cimetidine].

Alleen geregistreerde gebruikers kunnen artikelen vertalen
Log in Schrijf in
De link wordt op het klembord opgeslagen
C Yao
L Zhang
H Li

Sleutelwoorden

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To observe the mucosal injury of gastric corpus caused by hemorrhage reperfusion and to compare the anti-mucous injure effect between Salvia extract (SE) and cimetidine (CI) on it.

METHODS

Model of hemorrhagic shock reperfusion injury was produced by Itoh method. Wistar rats used in this experiment were randomly divided into three groups, the normal saline (NS) group, the SE group and the CI group.

RESULTS

(1) As compared with those in the NS control group, the index and depth of gastric mucosal lesion in the SE group and the CI group decreased significantly (P < 0.01), but the difference between the latter two was insignificant (P > 0.05). (2) Compared with those in the NS group and the CI group, the levels of PGE2, 6-keto-PGF1 alpha and 6-keto-PGF1 alpha/TXB2 raised and TXB2 lowered obviously in the SE group, while no significant difference was shown between those in the NS group and the CI group. (3) The intracellular calcium content in the SE group and the CI group was markedly higher than that in the NS group (P < 0.01), but there was insignificant difference between the SE and the CI group (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Both SE and CI could inhibit the gastric mucosal reperfusion injury, but with different mechanisms. SE could not only enhance the protective factors of gastric mucosa, but also abate the injury factors of it, while CI has the latter only.

Word lid van onze
facebookpagina

De meest complete database met geneeskrachtige kruiden, ondersteund door de wetenschap

  • Werkt in 55 talen
  • Kruidengeneesmiddelen gesteund door de wetenschap
  • Kruidenherkenning door beeld
  • Interactieve GPS-kaart - tag kruiden op locatie (binnenkort beschikbaar)
  • Lees wetenschappelijke publicaties met betrekking tot uw zoekopdracht
  • Zoek medicinale kruiden op hun effecten
  • Organiseer uw interesses en blijf op de hoogte van nieuwsonderzoek, klinische onderzoeken en patenten

Typ een symptoom of een ziekte en lees over kruiden die kunnen helpen, typ een kruid en zie ziekten en symptomen waartegen het wordt gebruikt.
* Alle informatie is gebaseerd op gepubliceerd wetenschappelijk onderzoek

Google Play badgeApp Store badge