The safety and clinical utility of esophagogastroduodenoscopy for acute gastrointestinal bleeding after myocardial infarction: a six-year study of 42 endoscopies in 34 consecutive patients at two university teaching hospitals.
Sleutelwoorden
Abstract
The risks versus benefits of panendoscopy performed soon after myocardial infarction were studied. At Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital from January 1986 through December 1991 and at Princeton Medical Center from January 1990 through December 1991, 82 patients developed overt gastrointestinal bleeding (1.2% of all myocardial infarctions) and 14 patients developed occult gastrointestinal bleeding (0.2% of all myocardial infarctions) within 3 weeks after myocardial infarction. Thirty-four of the patients underwent 42 panendoscopies within 3 weeks of myocardial infarction. Indications for the initial endoscopy included hematemesis in 25, melena without hematemesis in four, red blood per rectum in three, and occult blood in the stool in two. The initial panendoscopy, on average, was performed 6.2 +/- 7.5 (SD) days after myocardial infarction. The 34 initial panendoscopies provided the diagnosis in 27 (79%), and clinically helpful information in four (12%). Common diagnoses were duodenal ulcer in 11, hemorrhagic gastritis in four, and hemorrhagic esophagitis in three. Three complications were due to the initial endoscopy, including fatal ventricular tachycardia, near respiratory arrest, and hypotension. These complications occurred in three (37.5%) of eight patients who were significantly unstable before endoscopy. No (0%) complications occurred in the 26 relatively clinically stable patients undergoing the initial endoscopy. This difference in complication rate was statistically significant (p < 0.01, Fisher's exact test). We conclude that recent myocardial infarction is not an absolute contraindication to panendoscopy. In this retrospective study, the benefits exceeded the risks of panendoscopy in medically stable patients with significant gastrointestinal bleeding. Panendoscopy should be performed with monitoring by electrocardiography and pulse oximetry after stabilization of vital signs, which may require transfusion of blood products, supplemental oxygen administration, endotracheal intubation, and mechanically assisted ventilation. Panendoscopy in highly unstable patients had a high complication rate in this study.