Norwegian
Albanian
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Belarusian
Bengali
Bosnian
Catalan
Czech
Danish
Deutsch
Dutch
English
Estonian
Finnish
Français
Greek
Haitian Creole
Hebrew
Hindi
Hungarian
Icelandic
Indonesian
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Latvian
Lithuanian
Macedonian
Mongolian
Norwegian
Persian
Polish
Portuguese
Romanian
Russian
Serbian
Slovak
Slovenian
Spanish
Swahili
Swedish
Turkish
Ukrainian
Vietnamese
Български
中文(简体)
中文(繁體)
Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation 2013-Apr

Health benefits and costs of screening for colorectal cancer in people on dialysis or who have received a kidney transplant.

Bare registrerte brukere kan oversette artikler
Logg inn Registrer deg
Koblingen er lagret på utklippstavlen
Germaine Wong
Margaret W Y Li
Kirsten Howard
Danny K Hua
Jeremy R Chapman
Michael Bourke
Robin Turner
Allison Tong
Jonathan C Craig

Nøkkelord

Abstrakt

BACKGROUND

Despite the higher risk of colorectal cancer (CRC) in people with chronic kidney disease, it remains uncertain whether early detection through screening is cost-effective in this setting. We aimed to determine the costs and health benefits of CRC screening in people on dialysis or who have received a kidney transplant.

METHODS

Using a government health perspective, three probabilistic Markov models were constructed to compare the cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of annual immunochemical faecal occult blood test (iFOBT) screening against no-screening in a cohort of 1000 patients (age 50-70 years) on dialysis and with kidney transplants. A series of one-way, multi-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess the robustness of the model structure and the extent in which the model's assumptions were sensitive to the uncertainties within the input variables.

RESULTS

The incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) of CRC screening compared with no-screening were $138 828 per quality-adjusted life year [QALY; $122 977 per life year saved (LYS)], $121 973 per QALY ($ 85 095 per LYS) and $44 790 per QALY ($25 036 per LYS) for dialysis patients not listed on the transplant waiting list, patients on the transplant waiting list and patients with kidney transplants, respectively. The test specificity of iFOBT, the starting age of screening and cancer prevalence were influential factors that determined the overall cost-effectiveness of screening in this setting.

CONCLUSIONS

Screening for CRC using iFOBT may reduce cancer-specific mortality in patients on dialysis and with kidney transplants. However, the benefits and costs of screening CRCs in patients on dialysis, especially for those deemed not suitable for transplantation, greatly exceeded the typical thresholds for acceptable cost-effectiveness.

Bli med på
facebooksiden vår

Den mest komplette databasen med medisinske urter støttet av vitenskap

  • Fungerer på 55 språk
  • Urtekurer støttet av vitenskap
  • Urtegjenkjenning etter bilde
  • Interaktivt GPS-kart - merk urter på stedet (kommer snart)
  • Les vitenskapelige publikasjoner relatert til søket ditt
  • Søk medisinske urter etter deres effekter
  • Organiser dine interesser og hold deg oppdatert med nyheter, kliniske studier og patenter

Skriv inn et symptom eller en sykdom og les om urter som kan hjelpe, skriv en urt og se sykdommer og symptomer den brukes mot.
* All informasjon er basert på publisert vitenskapelig forskning

Google Play badgeApp Store badge