Norwegian
Albanian
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Belarusian
Bengali
Bosnian
Catalan
Czech
Danish
Deutsch
Dutch
English
Estonian
Finnish
Français
Greek
Haitian Creole
Hebrew
Hindi
Hungarian
Icelandic
Indonesian
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Latvian
Lithuanian
Macedonian
Mongolian
Norwegian
Persian
Polish
Portuguese
Romanian
Russian
Serbian
Slovak
Slovenian
Spanish
Swahili
Swedish
Turkish
Ukrainian
Vietnamese
Български
中文(简体)
中文(繁體)
Annals of Oncology 2014-Jul

Efficacy and safety of NEPA, an oral combination of netupitant and palonosetron, for prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting following highly emetogenic chemotherapy: a randomized dose-ranging pivotal study.

Bare registrerte brukere kan oversette artikler
Logg inn Registrer deg
Koblingen er lagret på utklippstavlen
P Hesketh
G Rossi
G Rizzi
M Palmas
A Alyasova
I Bondarenko
A Lisyanskaya
R Gralla

Nøkkelord

Abstrakt

BACKGROUND
NEPA is a novel oral fixed-dose combination of netupitant (NETU), a new highly selective neurokinin-1 (NK1) receptor antagonist (RA) and palonosetron (PALO), a pharmacologically and clinically distinct 5-hydroxytryptamine type 3 (5-HT3) RA. This study was designed to determine the appropriate clinical dose of NETU to combine with PALO for evaluation in the phase 3 NEPA program.

This randomized, double-blind, parallel group study in 694 chemotherapy naïve patients undergoing cisplatin-based chemotherapy for solid tumors compared three different oral doses of NETU (100, 200, and 300mg) + PALO 0.50mg with oral PALO 0.50mg, all given on day 1. A standard 3-day aprepitant (APR) + IV ondansetron (OND) 32mg regimen was included as an exploratory arm. All patients received oral dexamethasone on days 1-4. The primary efficacy endpoint was complete response (CR: no emesis, no rescue medication) during the overall (0-120h) phase.

RESULTS
All NEPA doses showed superior overall CR rates compared with PALO (87.4%, 87.6%, and 89.6% for NEPA100, NEPA200, and NEPA300, respectively versus 76.5% PALO; P < 0.050) with the highest NEPA300 dose studied showing an incremental benefit over lower NEPA doses for all efficacy endpoints. NEPA300 was significantly more effective than PALO and numerically better than APR + OND for all secondary efficacy endpoints of no emesis, no significant nausea, and complete protection (CR plus no significant nausea) rates during the acute (0-24h), delayed (25-120h), and overall phases. Adverse events were comparable across groups with no dose response. The percent of patients developing electrocardiogram changes was also comparable.

CONCLUSIONS
Each NEPA dose provided superior prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) compared with PALO following highly emetogenic chemotherapy; however, NEPA300 was the best dose studied, with an advantage over lower doses for all efficacy endpoints. The combination of NETU and PALO was well tolerated with a similar safety profile to PALO and APR + OND.

Bli med på
facebooksiden vår

Den mest komplette databasen med medisinske urter støttet av vitenskap

  • Fungerer på 55 språk
  • Urtekurer støttet av vitenskap
  • Urtegjenkjenning etter bilde
  • Interaktivt GPS-kart - merk urter på stedet (kommer snart)
  • Les vitenskapelige publikasjoner relatert til søket ditt
  • Søk medisinske urter etter deres effekter
  • Organiser dine interesser og hold deg oppdatert med nyheter, kliniske studier og patenter

Skriv inn et symptom eller en sykdom og les om urter som kan hjelpe, skriv en urt og se sykdommer og symptomer den brukes mot.
* All informasjon er basert på publisert vitenskapelig forskning

Google Play badgeApp Store badge