Polish
Albanian
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Belarusian
Bengali
Bosnian
Catalan
Czech
Danish
Deutsch
Dutch
English
Estonian
Finnish
Français
Greek
Haitian Creole
Hebrew
Hindi
Hungarian
Icelandic
Indonesian
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Latvian
Lithuanian
Macedonian
Mongolian
Norwegian
Persian
Polish
Portuguese
Romanian
Russian
Serbian
Slovak
Slovenian
Spanish
Swahili
Swedish
Turkish
Ukrainian
Vietnamese
Български
中文(简体)
中文(繁體)
European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics 2013-Feb

Plasma distribution of tetraphenylporphyrin derivatives relevant for Photodynamic Therapy: importance and limits of hydrophobicity.

Tylko zarejestrowani użytkownicy mogą tłumaczyć artykuły
Zaloguj się Zarejestruj się
Link zostanie zapisany w schowku
Benoît Chauvin
Bogdan I Iorga
Pierre Chaminade
Jean-Louis Paul
Philippe Maillard
Patrice Prognon
Athena Kasselouri

Słowa kluczowe

Abstrakcyjny

In the course of a Photodynamic Therapy (PDT) protocol, disaggregation of the sensitizer upon binding to plasma proteins and lipoproteins is one of the first steps following intravenous administration. This step governs its subsequent biodistribution and has even been evoked as possibly orientating mechanism of tumor destruction. It is currently admitted as being mainly dependent on sensitizer's hydrophobicity. In this context, as far as glycoconjugation of meso-tetraphenylporphyrin (TPP) macrocycle, a promising strategy to improve targeting of retinoblastoma cells confers to the sensitizer an amphiphilic character, we have studied the effect of this strategy on binding to plasma proteins and lipoproteins. With the exception of the majoritary protein binding (more than 80%) of more hydrophilic para-tetraglycoconjugated derivatives, high density lipoproteins (HDL) appear as main plasma carriers of the other amphiphilic glycoconjugated photosensitizers. This HDL-binding is a combined result of binding affinities (logKa ranging from 4.90 to 8.77 depending on the carrier and the TPP derivative considered) and relative plasma concentrations of the different carriers. Evaluation of binding affinities shows that if hydrophobicity can account for LDL- and HDL-affinities, it is not the case for albumin-affinity. Molecular docking simulations show that, if interactions are mainly of hydrophobic nature, polar interactions such as hydrogen bonds are also involved. This combination of interaction modalities should account for the absence of clear relationship between albumin-affinity and hydrophobicity. Taken together, our findings clarify the importance, but also the limits, of hydrophobicity's role in structure-plasma distribution relationship.

Dołącz do naszej strony
na Facebooku

Najbardziej kompletna baza danych ziół leczniczych poparta naukowo

  • Działa w 55 językach
  • Ziołowe leki poparte nauką
  • Rozpoznawanie ziół na podstawie obrazu
  • Interaktywna mapa GPS - oznacz zioła na miejscu (wkrótce)
  • Przeczytaj publikacje naukowe związane z Twoim wyszukiwaniem
  • Szukaj ziół leczniczych po ich działaniu
  • Uporządkuj swoje zainteresowania i bądź na bieżąco z nowościami, badaniami klinicznymi i patentami

Wpisz objaw lub chorobę i przeczytaj o ziołach, które mogą pomóc, wpisz zioło i zobacz choroby i objawy, na które są stosowane.
* Wszystkie informacje oparte są na opublikowanych badaniach naukowych

Google Play badgeApp Store badge