Polish
Albanian
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Belarusian
Bengali
Bosnian
Catalan
Czech
Danish
Deutsch
Dutch
English
Estonian
Finnish
Français
Greek
Haitian Creole
Hebrew
Hindi
Hungarian
Icelandic
Indonesian
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Latvian
Lithuanian
Macedonian
Mongolian
Norwegian
Persian
Polish
Portuguese
Romanian
Russian
Serbian
Slovak
Slovenian
Spanish
Swahili
Swedish
Turkish
Ukrainian
Vietnamese
Български
中文(简体)
中文(繁體)
Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology 2018-Mar

RASopathic comedo-like or cystic lesions induced by Vemurafenib: A model of skin lesions similar but not identical to those induced by dioxins (MADISH).

Tylko zarejestrowani użytkownicy mogą tłumaczyć artykuły
Zaloguj się Zarejestruj się
Link zostanie zapisany w schowku
G Kaya
N Saxer-Sekulic
A Kaya
O Sorg
A Boespflug
L Thomas
J H Saurat

Słowa kluczowe

Abstrakcyjny

BACKGROUND

Patients treated with vemurafenib for metastatic melanoma often develop skin lesions similar to those observed after exposure to dioxin-like compounds. We previously called these lesions MADISH (metabolizing acquired dioxin-induced skin hamartoma) when analysing a case of acute dioxin poisoning.

OBJECTIVE

We performed a clinical trial aimed at comparing the skin lesions observed under vemurafenib treatment with MADISH in order to bring to light a possible cross-talk between vemurafenib and dioxin pathways.

METHODS

In this case-series study we explored the histological aspect of skin lesions in 10 cases treated with vemurafenib for malignant melanoma. We also analysed the ability of vemurafenib and tyrosine kinase inhibitors to induce dioxin-AhR pathway.

RESULTS

All patients had skin lesions diagnosed as "non-inflammatory acneiform eruption" by dermatologists. These were predominantly facial with notable retro-auricular involvement and clinically compatible with chloracne/MADISH when assessed by dioxin expert. Histological analysis showed mostly comedo-like lesions and dermal cysts containing epithelial wall with basal or lateral epithelial projections and lamellar keratinization, and alterations of remaining sebaceous glands. The expression of CYP1A1, a gene highly induced following dioxin exposure, was not observed in these lesions. Vemurafenib and the tyrosine kinase inhibitors erlotinib and gefitinib did not induce CYP1A1 activity.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the skin lesions under vemurafenib treatment were morphologically similar to MADISH, the absence of CYP1A1 expression in dermal cysts of patients and the absence of CYP1A1 activation by vemurafenib led us consider that these skin lesions were different from true MADISH and not mediated by a cross-talk of AhR signalling, but rather to a hyperactivation of PI3K-Akt pathway as a consequence of vemurafenib treatment. A strong expression of CYP1A1 in the epithelial wall of dermal cysts must be required, parallel to the morphology of the lesions, to make the diagnosis of MADISH, the hallmark of an exposure to dioxin-like/chloracnegen compounds. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Dołącz do naszej strony
na Facebooku

Najbardziej kompletna baza danych ziół leczniczych poparta naukowo

  • Działa w 55 językach
  • Ziołowe leki poparte nauką
  • Rozpoznawanie ziół na podstawie obrazu
  • Interaktywna mapa GPS - oznacz zioła na miejscu (wkrótce)
  • Przeczytaj publikacje naukowe związane z Twoim wyszukiwaniem
  • Szukaj ziół leczniczych po ich działaniu
  • Uporządkuj swoje zainteresowania i bądź na bieżąco z nowościami, badaniami klinicznymi i patentami

Wpisz objaw lub chorobę i przeczytaj o ziołach, które mogą pomóc, wpisz zioło i zobacz choroby i objawy, na które są stosowane.
* Wszystkie informacje oparte są na opublikowanych badaniach naukowych

Google Play badgeApp Store badge