Polish
Albanian
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Belarusian
Bengali
Bosnian
Catalan
Czech
Danish
Deutsch
Dutch
English
Estonian
Finnish
Français
Greek
Haitian Creole
Hebrew
Hindi
Hungarian
Icelandic
Indonesian
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Latvian
Lithuanian
Macedonian
Mongolian
Norwegian
Persian
Polish
Portuguese
Romanian
Russian
Serbian
Slovak
Slovenian
Spanish
Swahili
Swedish
Turkish
Ukrainian
Vietnamese
Български
中文(简体)
中文(繁體)
Diseases of the Colon and Rectum 2020-Apr

Operative Incision and Drainage for Perirectal Abscesses: What are Risk Factors for Prolonged Length of Stay, Reoperation, and Readmission?

Tylko zarejestrowani użytkownicy mogą tłumaczyć artykuły
Zaloguj się Zarejestruj się
Link zostanie zapisany w schowku
Shonan Sho
Aaron Dawes
Formosa Chen
Marcia Russell
Mary Kwaan

Słowa kluczowe

Abstrakcyjny

Perirectal abscess is a common problem. Despite a seemingly simple disease to manage, clinical outcomes of perirectal abscesses can vary significantly given the wide array of patients that are susceptible to this disease.Our aims were to evaluate the outcomes following operative incision and drainage for perirectal abscess and to examine factors associated with length of stay, reoperations and readmissions.Retrospective analysis of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database.Hospitals participating in the surgical database.Adult patients undergoing outpatient perirectal abscess procedures from 2011 through 2016.Study outcomes were length of stay, reoperation and readmission.We identified 2,358 patients undergoing incision and drainage for perirectal abscesses. Approximately 35% of patients required hospital stay. Reoperations occurred in 3.4% with median time to reoperation of 15.5 days. The majority of reoperations (79.7%) were performed for additional incision and drainage. Readmissions rate was 3.0% with median time to readmission of 10.5 days. Common indications for readmissions included recurrent/persistent abscess (41.4%) and fever/sepsis (8.6%). Risk factors for hospitalization in multivariable analysis were preoperative sepsis, bleeding disorder, non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic races. For reoperations, risk factors included morbid obesity, preoperative sepsis and dependent functional status. Lastly for readmissions, female sex, steroid/immunosuppression and dependent functional status were significant risk factors.Retrospective analysis and potential selection bias in decisions on hospital stay, reoperation, and readmission.Suboptimal outcomes following outpatient operative incision and drainage for perirectal abscesses is not uncommon in the United States. In the era of value-based care, further work is needed to optimize utilization outcomes for high-risk patients undergoing perirectal incision and drainage. Strategies to prevent inadequate drainage at the time of the initial operative incision and drainage (i.e., use of imaging modalities, thorough exam under anesthesia) are warranted to improve patient outcomes. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B229.

Dołącz do naszej strony
na Facebooku

Najbardziej kompletna baza danych ziół leczniczych poparta naukowo

  • Działa w 55 językach
  • Ziołowe leki poparte nauką
  • Rozpoznawanie ziół na podstawie obrazu
  • Interaktywna mapa GPS - oznacz zioła na miejscu (wkrótce)
  • Przeczytaj publikacje naukowe związane z Twoim wyszukiwaniem
  • Szukaj ziół leczniczych po ich działaniu
  • Uporządkuj swoje zainteresowania i bądź na bieżąco z nowościami, badaniami klinicznymi i patentami

Wpisz objaw lub chorobę i przeczytaj o ziołach, które mogą pomóc, wpisz zioło i zobacz choroby i objawy, na które są stosowane.
* Wszystkie informacje oparte są na opublikowanych badaniach naukowych

Google Play badgeApp Store badge