Portuguese
Albanian
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Belarusian
Bengali
Bosnian
Catalan
Czech
Danish
Deutsch
Dutch
English
Estonian
Finnish
Français
Greek
Haitian Creole
Hebrew
Hindi
Hungarian
Icelandic
Indonesian
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Latvian
Lithuanian
Macedonian
Mongolian
Norwegian
Persian
Polish
Portuguese
Romanian
Russian
Serbian
Slovak
Slovenian
Spanish
Swahili
Swedish
Turkish
Ukrainian
Vietnamese
Български
中文(简体)
中文(繁體)
Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 2017-Mar

Accuracy of point-of-care lung ultrasonography for the diagnosis of cardiogenic pulmonary edema in dogs and cats with acute dyspnea.

Apenas usuários registrados podem traduzir artigos
Entrar Inscrever-se
O link é salvo na área de transferência
Jessica L Ward
Gregory R Lisciandro
Bruce W Keene
Sandra P Tou
Teresa C DeFrancesco

Palavras-chave

Resumo

OBJECTIVE To determine the accuracy of a point-of-care lung ultrasonography (LUS) protocol designed to diagnose cardiogenic pulmonary edema (CPE) in dyspneic dogs and cats. DESIGN Diagnostic test evaluation. ANIMALS 76 dogs and 24 cats evaluated for dyspnea. PROCEDURES Dogs and cats were evaluated by LUS; B lines were counted at 4 anatomic sites on each hemithorax. A site was scored as positive when > 3 B lines were identified. Animals with ≥ 2 positive sites identified on each hemithorax were considered positive for CPE. Medical records were evaluated to obtain a final diagnosis (reference standard) for calculation of the sensitivity and specificity of LUS and thoracic radiography for the diagnosis of CPE. RESULTS Dogs and cats with a final diagnosis of CPE had a higher number of positive LUS sites than did those with noncardiac causes of dyspnea. Overall sensitivity and specificity of LUS for the diagnosis of CPE were 84% and 74%, respectively, and these values were similar to those of thoracic radiography (85% and 87%, respectively). Use of LUS generally led to the misdiagnosis of CPE (ie, a false-positive result) in animals with diffuse interstitial or alveolar disease. Interobserver agreement on LUS results was high (κ > 0.85). CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE LUS was useful for predicting CPE as the cause of dyspnea in dogs and cats, although this technique could not be used to differentiate CPE from other causes of diffuse interstitial or alveolar disease. Point-of-care LUS has promise as a diagnostic tool for dyspneic dogs and cats.

Junte-se à nossa
página do facebook

O mais completo banco de dados de ervas medicinais apoiado pela ciência

  • Funciona em 55 idiomas
  • Curas herbais apoiadas pela ciência
  • Reconhecimento de ervas por imagem
  • Mapa GPS interativo - marcar ervas no local (em breve)
  • Leia publicações científicas relacionadas à sua pesquisa
  • Pesquise ervas medicinais por seus efeitos
  • Organize seus interesses e mantenha-se atualizado com as notícias de pesquisa, testes clínicos e patentes

Digite um sintoma ou doença e leia sobre ervas que podem ajudar, digite uma erva e veja as doenças e sintomas contra os quais ela é usada.
* Todas as informações são baseadas em pesquisas científicas publicadas

Google Play badgeApp Store badge