Portuguese
Albanian
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Belarusian
Bengali
Bosnian
Catalan
Czech
Danish
Deutsch
Dutch
English
Estonian
Finnish
Français
Greek
Haitian Creole
Hebrew
Hindi
Hungarian
Icelandic
Indonesian
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Latvian
Lithuanian
Macedonian
Mongolian
Norwegian
Persian
Polish
Portuguese
Romanian
Russian
Serbian
Slovak
Slovenian
Spanish
Swahili
Swedish
Turkish
Ukrainian
Vietnamese
Български
中文(简体)
中文(繁體)
Zhonghua wei chang wai ke za zhi = Chinese journal of gastrointestinal surgery 2015-Jul

[Effect of perioperative goal-directed fluid therapy on clinical outcome in elective colorectal resection].

Apenas usuários registrados podem traduzir artigos
Entrar Inscrever-se
O link é salvo na área de transferência
Qiang Lin
Huodong Zhou
Dafeng Li
Jinfeng Ye
Jinfu Hong
Yemao Hu

Palavras-chave

Resumo

OBJECTIVE

To assess the effect of perioperative goal-directed fluid therapy (GDFT) on clinical outcomes in elective colorectal resection.

METHODS

A total of 42 patients undergoing elective colorectal resection between March 2013 and December 2014 were recruited prospectively. GDFT was administrated based on corrected left ventricular ejection time and stroke volume using the esophageal Doppler monitoring. These patients were compared with a historical cohort of 58 patients managed without GDFT from January 2012 to February 2013. The primary endpoint was postoperative hospital stay and complication rate.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in the overall fluid volumes administered intraoperatively between two groups [(2657±1037) ml vs. (2846±1444) ml, P>0.05], but patients in GDFT group received higher volume of colloid fluids [(935±556) ml vs. (688±414) ml, P<0.05]. After a period of concordance at the start of operation, corrected left ventricular ejection time, stroke volume and cardiac index increased in GDFT group compared with control group (all P<0.05). No significant differences were found in postoperative hospital stay [(11.27±6.42) d vs. (12.04±7.18) d, P>0.05] and total complication rate (26.5% vs. 25.9%, P>0.05) between two groups, but GDFT group had earlier postoperative flatus [(3.52±0.84) d vs. (4.48±0.71) d, P<0.05] and faster tolerated diet [(5.92±1.18) d vs. (6.83±0.95) d, P<0.05].

CONCLUSIONS

Patients undergoing elective colorectal resection do not benefit from intraoperative GDFT. Further studies should be carried out to investigate whether GDFT can be routinely used during colorectal resection.

Junte-se à nossa
página do facebook

O mais completo banco de dados de ervas medicinais apoiado pela ciência

  • Funciona em 55 idiomas
  • Curas herbais apoiadas pela ciência
  • Reconhecimento de ervas por imagem
  • Mapa GPS interativo - marcar ervas no local (em breve)
  • Leia publicações científicas relacionadas à sua pesquisa
  • Pesquise ervas medicinais por seus efeitos
  • Organize seus interesses e mantenha-se atualizado com as notícias de pesquisa, testes clínicos e patentes

Digite um sintoma ou doença e leia sobre ervas que podem ajudar, digite uma erva e veja as doenças e sintomas contra os quais ela é usada.
* Todas as informações são baseadas em pesquisas científicas publicadas

Google Play badgeApp Store badge