Portuguese
Albanian
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Belarusian
Bengali
Bosnian
Catalan
Czech
Danish
Deutsch
Dutch
English
Estonian
Finnish
Français
Greek
Haitian Creole
Hebrew
Hindi
Hungarian
Icelandic
Indonesian
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Latvian
Lithuanian
Macedonian
Mongolian
Norwegian
Persian
Polish
Portuguese
Romanian
Russian
Serbian
Slovak
Slovenian
Spanish
Swahili
Swedish
Turkish
Ukrainian
Vietnamese
Български
中文(简体)
中文(繁體)
Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 1986-Apr

Reoperation for failed antireflux operations.

Apenas usuários registrados podem traduzir artigos
Entrar Inscrever-se
O link é salvo na área de transferência
A G Little
M K Ferguson
D B Skinner

Palavras-chave

Resumo

Experience with gastroesophageal reflux in patients without prior operations has yielded understanding of pathophysiology, surgical techniques, and results. Less is known about patients with failed antireflux operations. This report of 61 patients undergoing repeat antireflux procedures addresses this issues. Not included are patients with gastroesophageal reflux after ulcer operations or with inappropriate antireflux operations for motility disorders. Group A patients (n = 34) had only one previous operation, Group B (n = 19) had two, and Group C (n = 8) had three or more. Group C had significantly (p less than 0.05) more dysphagia and less heartburn than Group A. This observation correlated with findings from manometry, pH testing, and endoscopy, which showed progressively worse esophageal body function and a greater incidence of severe esophagitis and esophageal leak, but less gastroesophageal reflux, in Group C than B and in Group B compared to A. Operative mortality was 4.9%. Repeat antireflux operations in the 58 survivors were as follows: Group A included 25 standard antireflux procedures and seven bowel interpositions, and 75% were transthoracic. Group B included 16 antireflux procedures and one bowel interposition, and 82% were transthoracic. Group C included four antireflux procedures and three interpositions, and all were transthoracic. Clinical results were excellent or good in 85% in Group A, 66% in Group B, and only 42% in Group C (A versus C, p less than 0.05). Surgical complications increased from 27% in Group A to 75% in Group C (p less than 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with one prior operation and recurrent gastroesophageal reflux are similar to patients with no prior operations. Results of repeat antireflux operations deteriorate with increasing operations because of impaired esophageal function and progressive tissue destruction. Therefore, second reoperations must be definitive and resection and reconstruction with healthy tissue considered. A transthoracic approach is preferable for first reoperations and mandatory after multiple antireflux procedures.

Junte-se à nossa
página do facebook

O mais completo banco de dados de ervas medicinais apoiado pela ciência

  • Funciona em 55 idiomas
  • Curas herbais apoiadas pela ciência
  • Reconhecimento de ervas por imagem
  • Mapa GPS interativo - marcar ervas no local (em breve)
  • Leia publicações científicas relacionadas à sua pesquisa
  • Pesquise ervas medicinais por seus efeitos
  • Organize seus interesses e mantenha-se atualizado com as notícias de pesquisa, testes clínicos e patentes

Digite um sintoma ou doença e leia sobre ervas que podem ajudar, digite uma erva e veja as doenças e sintomas contra os quais ela é usada.
* Todas as informações são baseadas em pesquisas científicas publicadas

Google Play badgeApp Store badge