Portuguese
Albanian
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Belarusian
Bengali
Bosnian
Catalan
Czech
Danish
Deutsch
Dutch
English
Estonian
Finnish
Français
Greek
Haitian Creole
Hebrew
Hindi
Hungarian
Icelandic
Indonesian
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Latvian
Lithuanian
Macedonian
Mongolian
Norwegian
Persian
Polish
Portuguese
Romanian
Russian
Serbian
Slovak
Slovenian
Spanish
Swahili
Swedish
Turkish
Ukrainian
Vietnamese
Български
中文(简体)
中文(繁體)
American Journal of Cardiology 2018-Nov

The Metabolic Syndrome, Cardiovascular Fitness and Survival in Patients With Advanced Systolic Heart Failure.

Apenas usuários registrados podem traduzir artigos
Entrar Inscrever-se
O link é salvo na área de transferência
Amanda Ruth Vest
James Bernard Young
Leslie Cho

Palavras-chave

Resumo

The metabolic syndrome (MetS), which incorporates insulin resistance, visceral adiposity, and dyslipidemia, is an independent risk factor for incident heart failure (HF), but the impact on survival is uncertain. We sought to determine the relation between the metabolic syndrome and survival in ambulatory systolic HF patients and the impact of MetS on cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET). We identified adults with ejection fraction ≤40% who underwent CPETs between 2000 and 2011. Baseline MetS status was defined by 3 or more of: (1) Triglycerides ≥150 mg/dl; (2) High density lipoprotein <40 mg/dl males or <50 mg/dl females; (3) Diabetes mellitus; (4) Hypertension; (5) Body mass index ≥35 kg/m2. Minimally-adjusted (for age, sex, transplantation and left ventricular assist device implantation) and fully-adjusted Cox proportional hazards models were constructed for all-cause mortality. MetS prevalence was 37% (716 of 1,953) and median follow-up 5 years. Mortality was 36% for +MetS and 29% for -MetS (p = 0.006), with highest mortality in the subgroup with both MetS plus diabetes (39%). The minimally-adjusted hazard ratio for mortality with MetS was 1.27 (95% confidence interval, 1.08 to 1.49, p = 0.004). After adjustment, MetS was no longer independently associated with mortality (hazard ratio 1.01, 95% confidence interval 0.85 to 1.19, p = 0.921). Patients with MetS achieved poorer CPET performance compared and MetS was independently associated with a lower peak VO2. MetS was associated with a higher hazard of mortality in the minimally-adjusted model, which was primarily driven by the unfavorable impact of diabetes on mortality, but this association was no longer significant after full adjustment. In conclusion, there was no independent association between MetS and survival in an ambulatory systolic HF population.

Junte-se à nossa
página do facebook

O mais completo banco de dados de ervas medicinais apoiado pela ciência

  • Funciona em 55 idiomas
  • Curas herbais apoiadas pela ciência
  • Reconhecimento de ervas por imagem
  • Mapa GPS interativo - marcar ervas no local (em breve)
  • Leia publicações científicas relacionadas à sua pesquisa
  • Pesquise ervas medicinais por seus efeitos
  • Organize seus interesses e mantenha-se atualizado com as notícias de pesquisa, testes clínicos e patentes

Digite um sintoma ou doença e leia sobre ervas que podem ajudar, digite uma erva e veja as doenças e sintomas contra os quais ela é usada.
* Todas as informações são baseadas em pesquisas científicas publicadas

Google Play badgeApp Store badge