[The diagnosis of pulmonary embolism: the role of noninvasive technics].

Today a large group of patients with pulmonary embolism is still undetected because this disease is not suspected. We evaluated the role of routine clinical procedures such as history, chest x-ray, electrocardiogram and blood gas analysis in the diagnosis of this disease. We studied 177 patients sent to our observation with suspicion of pulmonary embolism, which was later confirmed in 97 and excluded in 80. Prolonged immobilization, surgical procedures and deep vein thrombosis are the most frequent predisposing factors (P less than 0.05 or less) in patients with pulmonary embolism with respect to patients with unconfirmed suspicion of embolism. Among symptoms and signs, pleuritic chest pain, sudden onset of dyspnea, tachypnea, fever, enlarged jugular veins, enhanced pulmonary component of the second heart sound, pulmonary systolic murmur and basal hypophonesis were the most frequent signs (P less than 0.005 or less) in patients with embolism. Among radiographic signs "sausage" descending pulmonary artery, diaphragmatic elevation, pulmonary infarction, Westermark sign and azygos vein enlargement were more frequent (P less than 0.05 or less) in patients with embolism with respect to patients with unconfirmed suspicion of embolism. Among electrocardiographic signs, tachycardia, P-R segment displacement and negative T wave in V1-V2 were more frequent in patients with embolism with respect to patients with unconfirmed suspicion of embolism (P less than 0.05 or less). PO2, standard pO2 and pCO2 were significantly lower (P less than 0.001) in patients with embolism. After discriminant analysis of the whole data set most patients were correctly classified as embolic (90/97) and non-embolic (75/80).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)