Romanian
Albanian
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Belarusian
Bengali
Bosnian
Catalan
Czech
Danish
Deutsch
Dutch
English
Estonian
Finnish
Français
Greek
Haitian Creole
Hebrew
Hindi
Hungarian
Icelandic
Indonesian
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Latvian
Lithuanian
Macedonian
Mongolian
Norwegian
Persian
Polish
Portuguese
Romanian
Russian
Serbian
Slovak
Slovenian
Spanish
Swahili
Swedish
Turkish
Ukrainian
Vietnamese
Български
中文(简体)
中文(繁體)
Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology 2020-Feb

Dronedarone treatment following cardioversion in patients with atrial fibrillation/flutter: a post hoc analysis of the EURIDIS and ADONIS trials.

Numai utilizatorii înregistrați pot traduce articole
Log In / Înregistrare
Linkul este salvat în clipboard
Munveer Thind
Harry Crijns
Gerald Naccarelli
James Reiffel
Valérie Genti
Mattias Wieloch
Andrew Koren
Peter Kowey

Cuvinte cheie

Abstract

The phase 3 EURIDIS and ADONIS studies evaluated dronedarone for atrial fibrillation (AF)/atrial flutter (AFL) recurrence in patients with non-permanent AF. Here we assessed whether patient characteristics and/or treatment outcomes in these studies differed based on need for cardioversion before randomization.Time to adjudicated first AF/AFL recurrence, symptomatic recurrence, cardiovascular hospitalization/death, and AF hospitalization, and safety were assessed by cardioversion status.Of 1237 patients randomized (2:1 dronedarone:placebo), 364 required baseline cardioversion (dronedarone 243, placebo 121). Patients requiring cardioversion had a greater prevalence of cardiovascular comorbidities and shorter times to first AF/AFL recurrence compared with those not requiring cardioversion. Dronedarone was associated with longer median time to first AF/AFL recurrence vs placebo regardless of cardioversion status (cardioversion: 50 vs 15 days, hazard ratio [HR] 0.76; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.59-0.97; P = 0.02; non-cardioversion: 150 vs 77 days, HR 0.76; 95% CI, 0.64-0.90; P < 0.01). Dronedarone was similarly associated with prolonged median time to symptomatic recurrence vs placebo in the cardioversion (347 vs 87 days, HR 0.65; 95% CI, 0.49-0.87) and non-cardioversion (288 vs 120 days, HR 0.74; 95% CI, 0.62-0.90) populations. Risk of cardiovascular hospitalization/death and first AF hospitalization was lower with dronedarone vs placebo regardless of cardioversion status, but differences were not statistically significant. Safety of dronedarone was similar in both groups.Patients requiring baseline cardioversion represent a distinct population, having more underlying cardiovascular disease and experiencing shorter time to AF/AFL recurrences. Dronedarone was associated with improved efficacy vs placebo regardless of cardioversion status. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Alăturați-vă paginii
noastre de facebook

Cea mai completă bază de date cu plante medicinale susținută de știință

  • Funcționează în 55 de limbi
  • Cure pe bază de plante susținute de știință
  • Recunoașterea ierburilor după imagine
  • Harta GPS interactivă - etichetați ierburile în locație (în curând)
  • Citiți publicațiile științifice legate de căutarea dvs.
  • Căutați plante medicinale după efectele lor
  • Organizați-vă interesele și rămâneți la curent cu noutățile de cercetare, studiile clinice și brevetele

Tastați un simptom sau o boală și citiți despre plante care ar putea ajuta, tastați o plantă și vedeți boli și simptome împotriva cărora este folosit.
* Toate informațiile se bazează pe cercetări științifice publicate

Google Play badgeApp Store badge