Russian
Albanian
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Belarusian
Bengali
Bosnian
Catalan
Czech
Danish
Deutsch
Dutch
English
Estonian
Finnish
Français
Greek
Haitian Creole
Hebrew
Hindi
Hungarian
Icelandic
Indonesian
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Latvian
Lithuanian
Macedonian
Mongolian
Norwegian
Persian
Polish
Portuguese
Romanian
Russian
Serbian
Slovak
Slovenian
Spanish
Swahili
Swedish
Turkish
Ukrainian
Vietnamese
Български
中文(简体)
中文(繁體)
The Lancet Infectious Diseases 2011-Feb

Efficacy and safety of mefloquine, artesunate, mefloquine-artesunate, tribendimidine, and praziquantel in patients with Opisthorchis viverrini: a randomised, exploratory, open-label, phase 2 trial.

Только зарегистрированные пользователи могут переводить статьи
Войти Зарегистрироваться
Ссылка сохраняется в буфер обмена
Phonepasong Soukhathammavong
Peter Odermatt
Somphou Sayasone
Youthanavanh Vonghachack
Penelope Vounatsou
Christoph Hatz
Kongsap Akkhavong
Jennifer Keiser

Ключевые слова

абстрактный

BACKGROUND

Praziquantel is the only drug available for treatment of Opisthorchis viverrini, although in-vivo studies point to activity of mefloquine, artesunate, and tribendimidine against this liver fluke. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of these drugs compared with that of praziquantel in patients with O viverrini infection.

METHODS

We did a randomised open-label trial between February and April, 2010, in the Saysetha district, Attapeu Province, Laos. Eligible patients were school children aged 10-15 years who had O viverrini infections. Patients were randomly assigned to one of five different treatment groups by use of a computer-generated randomisation code. We assessed efficacy as cure rate and egg reduction rate in intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses. The trial was registered with Current Controlled Trials, ISRCTN23425032.

RESULTS

125 children were randomly assigned: 25 received mefloquine, 24 artesunate, 24 mefloquine-artesunate, 27 tribendimidine, and 25 praziquantel. 19 patients were lost to follow-up. In the intention to treat analysis, 14 patients receiving praziquantel were cured compared with none with mefloquine, one with artesunate (odds ratio 0·03, 95% CI 0·004-0·29), one with mefloquine-artesunate (0·03, 0·004-0·29), and 19 with tribendimidine (1·87, 0·60-5·85). Egg reduction rate was 98·4% for praziquantel, 30·2% for mefloquine (egg reduction-rate ratio 1·61, 95% CI 0·21-0·72), 31·5% for artesunate (0·43, 0·23-0·80), 41·3% for mefloquine-artesunate (0·60, 0·31-1·10), and 99·3% for tribendimidine (1·00, 0·44-2·30). Most adverse events were mild or moderate and affected all treatment groups; serious adverse events--vertigo, nausea, vomiting, and anxiety--were reported only by patients taking mefloquine or mefloquine-artesunate.

CONCLUSIONS

Tribendimidine seems to be at least as efficacious as the drug of choice, praziquantel, for the treatment of O viverrini infections; both drugs were well tolerated. Mefloquine, artesunate, and mefloquine-artesunate did not show an effect. Tribendimidine should be further investigated with large clinical trials.

BACKGROUND

Swiss National Science Foundation, University of Basel.

Присоединяйтесь к нашей
странице facebook

Самая полная база данных о лекарственных травах, подтвержденная наукой

  • Работает на 55 языках
  • Травяные лекарства, подтвержденные наукой
  • Распознавание трав по изображению
  • Интерактивная карта GPS - отметьте травы на месте (скоро)
  • Прочтите научные публикации, связанные с вашим поиском
  • Ищите лекарственные травы по их действию
  • Организуйте свои интересы и будьте в курсе новостей исследований, клинических испытаний и патентов

Введите симптом или заболевание и прочтите о травах, которые могут помочь, введите лекарство и узнайте о болезнях и симптомах, против которых оно применяется.
* Вся информация основана на опубликованных научных исследованиях.

Google Play badgeApp Store badge