Slovak
Albanian
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Belarusian
Bengali
Bosnian
Catalan
Czech
Danish
Deutsch
Dutch
English
Estonian
Finnish
Français
Greek
Haitian Creole
Hebrew
Hindi
Hungarian
Icelandic
Indonesian
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Latvian
Lithuanian
Macedonian
Mongolian
Norwegian
Persian
Polish
Portuguese
Romanian
Russian
Serbian
Slovak
Slovenian
Spanish
Swahili
Swedish
Turkish
Ukrainian
Vietnamese
Български
中文(简体)
中文(繁體)
Journal of pharmaceutical health care and sciences 2018

Economic analysis of palonosetron versus granisetron in the standard triplet regimen for preventing chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in patients receiving highly emetogenic chemotherapy in Japan (TRIPLE phase III trial).

Články môžu prekladať iba registrovaní používatelia
Prihlásiť Registrácia
Odkaz sa uloží do schránky
Hisanori Shimizu
Kenichi Suzuki
Takeshi Uchikura
Daiki Tsuji
Takeharu Yamanaka
Hironobu Hashimoto
Koichi Goto
Reiko Matsui
Nobuhiko Seki
Toshikazu Shimada

Kľúčové slová

Abstrakt

We conducted an economic assessment using test data from the phase III TRIPLE study, which examined the efficacy of a 5-hydroxytryptamine 3 receptor antagonist as part of a standard triplet antiemetic regimen including aprepitant and dexamethasone in preventing chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in patients receiving cisplatin-based highly emetogenic chemotherapy (HEC).

Methods
We retrospectively investigated all medicines prescribed for antiemetic purposes within 120 h after the initiation of cisplatin administration during hospitalization. In the TRIPLE study, patients were assigned to treatment with granisetron (GRA) 1 mg (n = 413) or palonosetron (PALO) 0.75 mg (n = 414). The evaluation measure was the cost-effectiveness ratio (CER) assessed as the cost per complete response (CR; no vomiting/retching and no rescue medication). The analysis was conducted from the public healthcare payer's perspective.

Results
The CR rates were 59.1% in the GRA group and 65.7% in the PALO group (P = 0.0539), and the total frequencies of rescue medication use for these groups were 717 (153/413 patients) and 573 (123/414 patients), respectively. In both groups, drugs with antidopaminergic effects were chosen as rescue medication in 86% of patients. The costs of including GRA and PALO in the standard triplet antiemetic regimen were 15,342.8 and 27,863.8 Japanese yen (JPY), respectively. In addition, the total costs of rescue medication use were 73,883.8 (range, 71,106.4-79,017.1) JPY for the GRA group and 59,292.7 (range, 57,707.5-60,972.8) JPY for the PALO group. The CERs (JPY/CR) were 26,263.4 and 42,628.6 for the GRA and PALO groups, respectively, and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) between the groups was 189,171.6 (189,044.8-189,215.5) JPY/CR.

We found that PALO was more expensive than GRA in patients who received a cisplatin-based HEC regimen.

Pripojte sa k našej
facebookovej stránke

Najkompletnejšia databáza liečivých bylín podporovaná vedou

  • Pracuje v 55 jazykoch
  • Bylinné lieky podporené vedou
  • Rozpoznávanie bylín podľa obrázka
  • Interaktívna GPS mapa - označte byliny na mieste (už čoskoro)
  • Prečítajte si vedecké publikácie týkajúce sa vášho hľadania
  • Vyhľadajte liečivé byliny podľa ich účinkov
  • Usporiadajte svoje záujmy a držte krok s novinkami, klinickými skúškami a patentmi

Zadajte príznak alebo chorobu a prečítajte si o bylinách, ktoré by vám mohli pomôcť, napíšte bylinu a pozrite sa na choroby a príznaky, proti ktorým sa používa.
* Všetky informácie sú založené na publikovanom vedeckom výskume

Google Play badgeApp Store badge