Slovak
Albanian
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Belarusian
Bengali
Bosnian
Catalan
Czech
Danish
Deutsch
Dutch
English
Estonian
Finnish
Français
Greek
Haitian Creole
Hebrew
Hindi
Hungarian
Icelandic
Indonesian
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Latvian
Lithuanian
Macedonian
Mongolian
Norwegian
Persian
Polish
Portuguese
Romanian
Russian
Serbian
Slovak
Slovenian
Spanish
Swahili
Swedish
Turkish
Ukrainian
Vietnamese
Български
中文(简体)
中文(繁體)
Clinical and Experimental Rheumatology

Efficacy and safety of DMARDs in psoriatic arthritis: a systematic review.

Články môžu prekladať iba registrovaní používatelia
Prihlásiť Registrácia
Odkaz sa uloží do schránky
Claudia Alejandra Pereda
Maria Betina Nishishinya
Juan Antonio Martínez López
Loreto Carmona
Evidence-Based Working Group of the Spanish Society of Rheumatology

Kľúčové slová

Abstrakt

OBJECTIVE

Disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) are frequently prescribed as a first step therapy in active psoriatic arthritis (PsA). However, evidence is sparse and scattered. The objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of DMARDs in PsA.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review based on electronic searches through Medline, Cochrane Central and Embase (from July 1980-2010) for randomised control trials (RCTs) in PsA. Outcome measures were those included in the core-set from Outcome Measures in Rheumatology Clinical Trials (OMERACT) and adverse effects.

RESULTS

A preliminary search identified 3781 potentially relevant RCTs, while only 11 fulfilled inclusion criteria. Ten studies had a parallel design and, one was a cross-over trial. Quality reached a Jadad score over 3 in 6/11 (54.6%). We observed evidence of a moderate improvement of pain and reduction of ESR with DMARDs. The global risk of withdrawals due to adverse events was 2.41 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.53, 3.82]. The risk of GI adverse effects (nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, diarrhoea and/or oral ulcers) was 2.02 [95% CI 1.34, 3.03] and of headache was 2.34[95% CI 1.05, 5.19]. There were no significant differences in the rate of increase of flu-like symptoms, rash, or liver enzymes.

CONCLUSIONS

The evidence of DMARD efficacy in PsA is certainly limited, basically due to the small number of studies, dissimilar outcomes being evaluated, high withdrawal rates, and absence of new published studies. With regard to adverse effects, only GI events and headaches were significant compared to placebo.

Pripojte sa k našej
facebookovej stránke

Najkompletnejšia databáza liečivých bylín podporovaná vedou

  • Pracuje v 55 jazykoch
  • Bylinné lieky podporené vedou
  • Rozpoznávanie bylín podľa obrázka
  • Interaktívna GPS mapa - označte byliny na mieste (už čoskoro)
  • Prečítajte si vedecké publikácie týkajúce sa vášho hľadania
  • Vyhľadajte liečivé byliny podľa ich účinkov
  • Usporiadajte svoje záujmy a držte krok s novinkami, klinickými skúškami a patentmi

Zadajte príznak alebo chorobu a prečítajte si o bylinách, ktoré by vám mohli pomôcť, napíšte bylinu a pozrite sa na choroby a príznaky, proti ktorým sa používa.
* Všetky informácie sú založené na publikovanom vedeckom výskume

Google Play badgeApp Store badge