Slovak
Albanian
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Belarusian
Bengali
Bosnian
Catalan
Czech
Danish
Deutsch
Dutch
English
Estonian
Finnish
Français
Greek
Haitian Creole
Hebrew
Hindi
Hungarian
Icelandic
Indonesian
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Latvian
Lithuanian
Macedonian
Mongolian
Norwegian
Persian
Polish
Portuguese
Romanian
Russian
Serbian
Slovak
Slovenian
Spanish
Swahili
Swedish
Turkish
Ukrainian
Vietnamese
Български
中文(简体)
中文(繁體)
Minerva Medica

[Tropisetron versus ondansetron in the prevention and control of emesis in patients undergoing chemotherapy with FAC/FEC for metastatic or surgically treated breast carcinoma].

Články môžu prekladať iba registrovaní používatelia
Prihlásiť Registrácia
Odkaz sa uloží do schránky
E Campora
C Simoni
R Rosso

Kľúčové slová

Abstrakt

OBJECTIVE. To compare the efficacy and tolerability of standard dosage of tropisetron and ondansetron in controlling emesis induced by chemotherapeutic regimen not containing cisplatin. DESIGN. Open, comparative, parallel-group, randomized study. SETTING. Day hospital to which patients were admitted only on the day on chemotherapy when the antiemetic was given intravenously.

METHODS

Forty adult women with metastatic or operated breast cancer who could benefit by adjuvant treatment.

METHODS

pregnancy, breast-feeding, symptoms of intracranial hypertension, current medical conditions which could put the patient at risk (e.g. severe cardiac insufficiency, uncontrolled infection, etc.), abnormal bowel rhythm, and treatment with antitumoral drugs in the previous 6 months. TREATMENT. During three cycles of chemotherapy with FAC/FEC (600 mg/m2 5-fluro-uracil, 600 mg/m2 cyclophosphamide and 50 mg/m2 adriamycin or 60 mg/m2 epidoxorubicin) antiemetic treatment was given as follows: tropisetron 5 mg/day (in intravenous infusion before chemotherapy and then orally for 4 days) or ondansetron 8 mg x 3/day (the first dose intravenously before chemotherapy and the subsequent doses orally until the end of the fourth day after chemotherapy).

METHODS

Severity of nausea and number of vomiting episodes each day during antiemetic treatment; ECG; vital signs and blood tests before each cycle and at the end of the study; side effects.

RESULTS

On the worst day of the three cycles complete control of emesis was obtained in 50, 75 and 84.6% of the patients treated with tropisetron and in 60, 58.8 and 66.7% of those who received ondansetron, the differences being not significant (p > 0.05). The only side effects were headache (in 1 patient given tropisetron) and skin rash (1 given ondansetron).

CONCLUSIONS

The efficacy and tolerability of 5 mg/day of tropisetron and 24 mg/day of ondansetron were almost identical.

Pripojte sa k našej
facebookovej stránke

Najkompletnejšia databáza liečivých bylín podporovaná vedou

  • Pracuje v 55 jazykoch
  • Bylinné lieky podporené vedou
  • Rozpoznávanie bylín podľa obrázka
  • Interaktívna GPS mapa - označte byliny na mieste (už čoskoro)
  • Prečítajte si vedecké publikácie týkajúce sa vášho hľadania
  • Vyhľadajte liečivé byliny podľa ich účinkov
  • Usporiadajte svoje záujmy a držte krok s novinkami, klinickými skúškami a patentmi

Zadajte príznak alebo chorobu a prečítajte si o bylinách, ktoré by vám mohli pomôcť, napíšte bylinu a pozrite sa na choroby a príznaky, proti ktorým sa používa.
* Všetky informácie sú založené na publikovanom vedeckom výskume

Google Play badgeApp Store badge