Slovenian
Albanian
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Belarusian
Bengali
Bosnian
Catalan
Czech
Danish
Deutsch
Dutch
English
Estonian
Finnish
Français
Greek
Haitian Creole
Hebrew
Hindi
Hungarian
Icelandic
Indonesian
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Latvian
Lithuanian
Macedonian
Mongolian
Norwegian
Persian
Polish
Portuguese
Romanian
Russian
Serbian
Slovak
Slovenian
Spanish
Swahili
Swedish
Turkish
Ukrainian
Vietnamese
Български
中文(简体)
中文(繁體)
Clinical Lung Cancer 2016-Jan

Treatment Rationale and Study Design for the JUNIPER Study: A Randomized Phase III Study of Abemaciclib With Best Supportive Care Versus Erlotinib With Best Supportive Care in Patients With Stage IV Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer With a Detectable KRAS Mutation Whose Disease Has Progressed After Platinum-Based Chemotherapy.

Samo registrirani uporabniki lahko prevajajo članke
Prijava / prijava
Povezava se shrani v odložišče
Jonathan W Goldman
Peipei Shi
Martin Reck
Luis Paz-Ares
Andrew Koustenis
Karla C Hurt

Ključne besede

Povzetek

This clinical trial summary provides the background and rationale for the JUNIPER study (NCT02152631). JUNIPER is a randomized study of abemaciclib (200 mg orally every 12 hours) with best supportive care (BSC) versus erlotinib (150 mg orally every 24 hours) with BSC in patients with stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) whose tumors have detectable Kirsten rat sarcoma (KRAS) mutations and whose disease has progressed after platinum-based chemotherapy and 1 other previous therapy, or who are not eligible for further chemotherapy. Approximately 550 patients will be randomized in a 3:2 ratio and stratified according to number of previous chemotherapy regimens (1 vs. 2), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (0 vs. 1), sex (male vs. female), and KRAS mutation (G12C vs. others). Erlotinib was chosen as the control arm, because it is the only agent indicated for second- and third-line therapy in advanced NSCLC. Treatment will continue until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity occurs, with assessments every 28 days, followed by short-term and long-term follow-up. The coprimary efficacy objectives of this study are progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS); secondary objectives are overall response rate, changes in patient-reported pain and disease-related symptoms, changes in health status, resource utilization, safety and tolerability, and pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics. This design has 80% power to detect OS hazard ratio (HR) of 0.75 (type I error 0.045) and PFS HR of 0.67 (type I error 0.005). If the coprimary objectives (OS and PFS) are achieved, this study will provide a new alternative third-line treatment option for patients with NSCLC whose tumors have detectable KRAS mutations.

Pridružite se naši
facebook strani

Najbolj popolna baza zdravilnih zelišč, podprta z znanostjo

  • Deluje v 55 jezikih
  • Zeliščna zdravila, podprta z znanostjo
  • Prepoznavanje zelišč po sliki
  • Interaktivni GPS zemljevid - označite zelišča na lokaciji (kmalu)
  • Preberite znanstvene publikacije, povezane z vašim iskanjem
  • Iščite zdravilna zelišča po njihovih učinkih
  • Organizirajte svoje interese in bodite na tekočem z raziskavami novic, kliničnimi preskušanji in patenti

Vnesite simptom ali bolezen in preberite o zeliščih, ki bi lahko pomagala, vnesite zelišče in si oglejte bolezni in simptome, proti katerim se uporablja.
* Vse informacije temeljijo na objavljenih znanstvenih raziskavah

Google Play badgeApp Store badge