Albanian
Albanian
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Belarusian
Bengali
Bosnian
Catalan
Czech
Danish
Deutsch
Dutch
English
Estonian
Finnish
Français
Greek
Haitian Creole
Hebrew
Hindi
Hungarian
Icelandic
Indonesian
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Latvian
Lithuanian
Macedonian
Mongolian
Norwegian
Persian
Polish
Portuguese
Romanian
Russian
Serbian
Slovak
Slovenian
Spanish
Swahili
Swedish
Turkish
Ukrainian
Vietnamese
Български
中文(简体)
中文(繁體)
Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety 2019-Sep

Cardiovascular risks associated with dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors monotherapy compared with other antidiabetes drugs in the Japanese population: A nationwide cohort study.

Vetëm përdoruesit e regjistruar mund të përkthejnë artikuj
Identifikohuni Regjistrohu
Lidhja ruhet në kujtesën e fragmenteve
Maki Komamine
Kazuhiro Kajiyama
Chieko Ishiguro
Yoshiaki Uyama

Fjalë kyçe

Abstrakt

We evaluated the cardiovascular risk associated with dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4Is) as monotherapy compared with other antidiabetic drugs in Japan.We conducted a nationwide cohort study involving 2 716 000 diabetes patients in Japan. New users of any antidiabetic drug as monotherapy between 1 April 2010 and 31 October 2014 were identified. Occurrences of myocardial infarction (MI), heart failure (HF), and stroke requiring hospitalization associated with DPP-4Is were compared with those associated with biguanides (BGs), sulfonylureas (SUs), or α-glucosidase inhibitors (α-GIs). Adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) for these outcomes were estimated by Cox proportional hazards model. Propensity score standardization was used to control for confounding.We identified 1 105 103 patients using DPP-4Is, 278 280 patients using BGs, 273 449 patients using SUs, and 217 026 patients using α-GIs. The risks of MI and HF for DPP-4I users were significantly higher than those for BG users (MI: aHR, 1.48 [95%CI, 1.20-1.82], HF: aHR, 1.46 [95%CI, 1.31-1.62]), while significantly lower than those for SU users (MI: aHR, 0.84 [95%CI, 0.72-0.98], HF: aHR, 0.86 [95%CI, 0.81-0.92]). The risk of MI for DPP-4I users was similar to that for α-GI users, while the risk of HF for DPP-4I users was slightly higher than for α-GI users (MI: aHR, 0.98 [95%CI, 0.82-1.17], HF: aHR, 1.12[95%CI, 1.04-1.21]).Risk of MI and HF requiring hospitalization associated with DPP-4Is as monotherapy was significantly higher than BGs, significantly lower than SUs, and similar to α-GIs.

Bashkohuni në faqen
tonë në facebook

Baza e të dhënave më e plotë e bimëve medicinale e mbështetur nga shkenca

  • Punon në 55 gjuhë
  • Kurime bimore të mbështetura nga shkenca
  • Njohja e bimëve nga imazhi
  • Harta GPS interaktive - etiketoni bimët në vendndodhje (së shpejti)
  • Lexoni botime shkencore në lidhje me kërkimin tuaj
  • Kërkoni bimë medicinale nga efektet e tyre
  • Organizoni interesat tuaja dhe qëndroni në azhurnim me kërkimet e lajmeve, provat klinike dhe patentat

Shkruani një simptomë ose një sëmundje dhe lexoni në lidhje me barërat që mund të ndihmojnë, shtypni një barishte dhe shikoni sëmundjet dhe simptomat që përdoren kundër.
* I gjithë informacioni bazohet në kërkimin shkencor të botuar

Google Play badgeApp Store badge