Serbian
Albanian
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Belarusian
Bengali
Bosnian
Catalan
Czech
Danish
Deutsch
Dutch
English
Estonian
Finnish
Français
Greek
Haitian Creole
Hebrew
Hindi
Hungarian
Icelandic
Indonesian
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Latvian
Lithuanian
Macedonian
Mongolian
Norwegian
Persian
Polish
Portuguese
Romanian
Russian
Serbian
Slovak
Slovenian
Spanish
Swahili
Swedish
Turkish
Ukrainian
Vietnamese
Български
中文(简体)
中文(繁體)
Nutrition, Metabolism and Cardiovascular Diseases 2017-Sep

A comparison of gamma-glutamyl transferase and alkaline phosphatase as prognostic markers in patients with coronary heart disease.

Само регистровани корисници могу преводити чланке
Пријави се / Пријави се
Веза се чува у привремену меморију
G Ndrepepa
S Holdenrieder
S Cassese
M Fusaro
E Xhepa
K-L Laugwitz
H Schunkert
A Kastrati

Кључне речи

Апстрактан

OBJECTIVE

Whether gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT) or alkaline phosphatase (ALP) is a better prognostic marker in patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) remains unknown. The aim of this study was to compare the prognostic value of GGT and ALP in patients with CHD.

RESULTS

This study included 3768 patients with CHD. The main study outcome was 3-year all-cause mortality. The median values of GGT and ALP were 36.2 U/L and 69.3 U/L. Patients were divided into subgroups according to GGT or ALP activity > or ≤median. Overall, there were 304 deaths: 195 deaths occurred in patients with GGT >median (n = 1882) and 109 deaths occurred in patients with GGT ≤median (n = 1886); Kaplan-Meier [KM] estimates of all-cause mortality were 11.9% and 6.4% (unadjusted hazard ratio [HR] = 1.85, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.46 to 2.34]; P < 0.001). According to ALP activity, 186 deaths occurred in patients with ALP >median (n = 1883) and 118 deaths occurred in patients with ALP ≤median (n = 1885); KM estimates of all-cause mortality were 11.4% and 7.1% (unadjusted HR = 1.64 [1.30-2.06]; P < 0.001). After adjustment, GGT (adjusted HR = 1.32 [1.11-1.58]; P = 0.002) but not ALP (adjusted HR = 1.20 [1.00-1.43]; P = 0.051, with both HR calculated per 1 unit increment in logarithmic GGT or ALP scale) remained significantly associated with the risk for mortality. The C statistic of the mortality model with GGT was greater than the C statistic of the model with ALP (0.831 [0.802-0.859] vs. 0.826 [0.793-0.855]; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with CHD, GGT was a stronger correlate of all-cause mortality than ALP.

Придружите се нашој
facebook страници

Најкомплетнија база лековитог биља подржана науком

  • Ради на 55 језика
  • Биљни лекови потпомогнути науком
  • Препознавање биљака по слици
  • Интерактивна ГПС мапа - означите биље на локацији (ускоро)
  • Читајте научне публикације повезане са вашом претрагом
  • Претражите лековито биље по њиховим ефектима
  • Организујте своја интересовања и будите у току са истраживањем вести, клиничким испитивањима и патентима

Упишите симптом или болест и прочитајте о биљкама које би могле да помогну, укуцајте неку биљку и погледајте болести и симптоме против којих се користи.
* Све информације се заснивају на објављеним научним истраживањима

Google Play badgeApp Store badge