Serbian
Albanian
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Belarusian
Bengali
Bosnian
Catalan
Czech
Danish
Deutsch
Dutch
English
Estonian
Finnish
Français
Greek
Haitian Creole
Hebrew
Hindi
Hungarian
Icelandic
Indonesian
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Latvian
Lithuanian
Macedonian
Mongolian
Norwegian
Persian
Polish
Portuguese
Romanian
Russian
Serbian
Slovak
Slovenian
Spanish
Swahili
Swedish
Turkish
Ukrainian
Vietnamese
Български
中文(简体)
中文(繁體)
Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology 2014-Jul

The effect of component-resolved diagnosis on specific immunotherapy prescription in children with hay fever.

Само регистровани корисници могу преводити чланке
Пријави се / Пријави се
Веза се чува у привремену меморију
Giovanna Stringari
Salvatore Tripodi
Carlo Caffarelli
Arianna Dondi
Riccardo Asero
Andrea Di Rienzo Businco
Annamaria Bianchi
Paolo Candelotti
Giampaolo Ricci
Federica Bellini

Кључне речи

Апстрактан

BACKGROUND

Sensitization to profilins and other cross-reacting molecules might hinder proper specific immunotherapy (SIT) prescription in polysensitized patients with pollen-related allergic rhinitis (AR). In these patients, component-resolved diagnosis (CRD) might modify SIT prescription by improving the identification of the disease-eliciting pollen sources.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to measure the effect of CRD on SIT prescription in children with pollen-related AR.

METHODS

Children (n = 651) with moderate-to-severe pollen-related AR were recruited between May 2009 and June 2011 in 16 Italian outpatient clinics. Skin prick test (SPT) reactivity to grass, cypress, olive, mugwort, pellitory, and/or Betulaceae pollen was considered clinically relevant if symptoms occurred during the corresponding peak pollen season. IgE sensitization to Phl p 1, Phl p 5, Bet v 1, Cup a 1, Art v 1, Ole e 1, Par j 2, and Phl p 12 (profilin) was measured by using ImmunoCAP. SIT prescription was modeled on SPT responses first and then remodeled considering also CRD according to GA(2)LEN-European Academy of Allergology and Clinical Immunology guidelines and the opinions of 14 pediatric allergists.

RESULTS

No IgE to the respective major allergens was detected in significant proportions of patients with supposed clinically relevant sensitization to mugwort (45/65 [69%]), Betulaceae (146/252 [60%]), pellitory (78/257 [30%]), olive (111/390 [28%]), cypress (28/184 [15%]), and grass (56/568 [10%]). IgE to profilins, polcalcins, or both could justify 173 (37%) of 464 of these SPT reactions. After CRD, the SPT-based decision on SIT prescription or composition was changed in 277 (42%) of 651 or 315 (48%) of 651 children according to the European or American approach, respectively, and in 305 (47%) of 651 children according to the opinion of the 14 local pediatric allergists.

CONCLUSIONS

In children with pollen-related AR, applying CRD leads to changes in a large proportion of SIT prescriptions as opposed to relying on clinical history and SPT alone. The hypothesis that CRD-guided prescription improves SIT efficacy deserves to be tested.

Придружите се нашој
facebook страници

Најкомплетнија база лековитог биља подржана науком

  • Ради на 55 језика
  • Биљни лекови потпомогнути науком
  • Препознавање биљака по слици
  • Интерактивна ГПС мапа - означите биље на локацији (ускоро)
  • Читајте научне публикације повезане са вашом претрагом
  • Претражите лековито биље по њиховим ефектима
  • Организујте своја интересовања и будите у току са истраживањем вести, клиничким испитивањима и патентима

Упишите симптом или болест и прочитајте о биљкама које би могле да помогну, укуцајте неку биљку и погледајте болести и симптоме против којих се користи.
* Све информације се заснивају на објављеним научним истраживањима

Google Play badgeApp Store badge