Swedish
Albanian
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Belarusian
Bengali
Bosnian
Catalan
Czech
Danish
Deutsch
Dutch
English
Estonian
Finnish
Français
Greek
Haitian Creole
Hebrew
Hindi
Hungarian
Icelandic
Indonesian
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Latvian
Lithuanian
Macedonian
Mongolian
Norwegian
Persian
Polish
Portuguese
Romanian
Russian
Serbian
Slovak
Slovenian
Spanish
Swahili
Swedish
Turkish
Ukrainian
Vietnamese
Български
中文(简体)
中文(繁體)
Revista Alergia Mexico

[Diagnostic use of enzymatic RAST skin tests and determination of eosinophils in nasal mucosa in allergic rhinitis].

Endast registrerade användare kan översätta artiklar
Logga in Bli medlem
Länken sparas på Urklipp
C A Gómez Castillo
S Martínez Cairo Cueto

Nyckelord

Abstrakt

OBJECTIVE

Allergic rhinitis is the most frequent disease mediated by immunoglobulin E (IgE). Nasal challenge is the gold standard for the diagnosis of allergic rhinitis. Skin tests (ST) are the most used diagnostic method to detect the presence of specific IgE bind to skin mast cells. The exposition of the nasal mucous membrane to the allergen is followed by an increase of the local eosinophils; the count of eosinophils in nasal mucous (ENM) is a diagnostic test for allergic rhinitis. Enzymatic RAST or enzymatic allergo-sorbent test (ESA) measures the level of serum allergen-specific IgE.

OBJECTIVE

To measure the sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic precision of ST, EAST and ENM in allergic rhinitis.

METHODS

We studied 241 individuals, 162 of them had allergic rhinitis, and 79 were healthy controls. They underwent nasal challenge and intradermic ST for Dermatophagoies spp (acarus). Fraxinus americana (Ash-tree), Amaranthus palmieri (quelite), Cynodon Dactylon (capriola) and Felis catus (cat), EAST for Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus (acarus), and ENIVI. Results of ST, EAST and ENIVI were compared with their corresponding nasal challenge, and the prevalence of allergic rhinitis for each allergen was calculated. The best cut point was assessed by means of receiver-operator curves (ROC), and sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, inter-observer concordance coefficient, area under ROC (0), standard error of 0 (SEO), and 95% confidence interval of 0 of each test were calculated using the best cut point.

RESULTS

ST and EAST had the best sensitivity and specificity. ENM had the lowest sensitivity and specificity.

CONCLUSIONS

For the diagnosis of Dermatophagoides spp allergic rhinitis ST for Dermatophagoides spp and EAST for Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus have the same diagnostic precision. According to the indexes for diagnostic precision, and inter-observer concordance coefficient, ST and EAST are useful to diagnose allergic rhinitis induced by the evaluated allergens. ENIVI is a test that is not very useful for the diagnosis of allergic rhinitis.

Gå med på vår
facebook-sida

Den mest kompletta databasen med medicinska örter som stöds av vetenskapen

  • Fungerar på 55 språk
  • Växtbaserade botemedel som stöds av vetenskap
  • Örter igenkänning av bild
  • Interaktiv GPS-karta - märka örter på plats (kommer snart)
  • Läs vetenskapliga publikationer relaterade till din sökning
  • Sök efter medicinska örter efter deras effekter
  • Organisera dina intressen och håll dig uppdaterad med nyheterna, kliniska prövningar och patent

Skriv ett symptom eller en sjukdom och läs om örter som kan hjälpa, skriv en ört och se sjukdomar och symtom den används mot.
* All information baseras på publicerad vetenskaplig forskning

Google Play badgeApp Store badge