Swedish
Albanian
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Belarusian
Bengali
Bosnian
Catalan
Czech
Danish
Deutsch
Dutch
English
Estonian
Finnish
Français
Greek
Haitian Creole
Hebrew
Hindi
Hungarian
Icelandic
Indonesian
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Latvian
Lithuanian
Macedonian
Mongolian
Norwegian
Persian
Polish
Portuguese
Romanian
Russian
Serbian
Slovak
Slovenian
Spanish
Swahili
Swedish
Turkish
Ukrainian
Vietnamese
Български
中文(简体)
中文(繁體)
Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases

Environmental tobacco smoke exposure and risk of stroke in nonsmokers: a review with meta-analysis.

Endast registrerade användare kan översätta artiklar
Logga in Bli medlem
Länken sparas på Urklipp
Peter N Lee
Barbara A Forey

Nyckelord

Abstrakt

Our objective was to provide a comprehensive review of the epidemiologic evidence relating stroke to exposure to environmental tobacco smoke (passive smoking) in lifelong nonsmokers. In all, 7 prospective, 6 case-control, and 3 cross-sectional studies were identified that provided relevant information. The 16 studies varied considerably in design, exposure indices used, and disease definition. Based on 24 sex-specific relative risk estimates, and using current spousal exposure (or nearest equivalent) as the exposure index, meta-analysis gave an overall estimate of 1.25 (95% confidence interval 1.16-1.36), with no significant heterogeneity. There was no significant heterogeneity by sex, year of publication, fatality, or disease end point. There was some indication that relative risks were less elevated in prospective studies and in US or European studies. No elevation was seen for subarachnoid hemorrhage. The estimate was similar using ever rather than current exposure, or total rather than spousal exposure. Adjustment for risk factors other than age had no material effect on the estimate. Eight studies provided dose-response estimates, the combined relative risk for the highest level of exposure being 1.56 (95% confidence interval 1.34-1.82). Many studies have evident weaknesses, and recall bias and particularly publication bias are major concerns. Currently, the association is only suggestive of a possible causal relationship. A clearer picture could be obtained using data from existing very large prospective studies that have already provided risk estimates for passive smoking and heart disease, and by conducting large, well-designed studies of incident stroke.

Gå med på vår
facebook-sida

Den mest kompletta databasen med medicinska örter som stöds av vetenskapen

  • Fungerar på 55 språk
  • Växtbaserade botemedel som stöds av vetenskap
  • Örter igenkänning av bild
  • Interaktiv GPS-karta - märka örter på plats (kommer snart)
  • Läs vetenskapliga publikationer relaterade till din sökning
  • Sök efter medicinska örter efter deras effekter
  • Organisera dina intressen och håll dig uppdaterad med nyheterna, kliniska prövningar och patent

Skriv ett symptom eller en sjukdom och läs om örter som kan hjälpa, skriv en ört och se sjukdomar och symtom den används mot.
* All information baseras på publicerad vetenskaplig forskning

Google Play badgeApp Store badge